from Brent Smith for World Net Daily:
Despite the conventional wisdom, I still believe that the president may pull this election out. The election fraud in several states still appears too obvious for him not to prevail. And thankfully, he’s not your run-of-the-mill Republican – he’s a fighter.
But suppose he doesn’t win. What then?
Well, you can bet Donald Trump will survive and be just fine.
What may not survive is the hapless Trump-less Republican Party, which frankly doesn’t deserve to. If the radical leftists that make up the present-day Democratic Party successfully vanquish Donald Trump, how will the Republicans possibly pick up the pieces? read more
from The American Thinker:
The downfall of Fox News’s Chris Wallace and John Roberts
Some men are alphas, like President Trump, and some men are betas, like Al Gore and the sneering, puffing Biden. And then there are men who aren’t even strong enough to be betas. They are, instead, weak, mewling creatures who lack either presence or power, and who then cry about it afterward. Chris Wallace and John Roberts, both employees at Fox News, have exhibited behavior that’s so craven and humiliated themselves so badly in the eyes of Fox News’s core audience that they should be retired immediately. read more
from Victor Davis Hanson for Fox News:
After coronavirus — will America be a roaring giant or crying baby?
Marshal Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto commanded the Imperial Japanese Navy in World War II until he was killed in April 1943. Despite the dialogue from the 1970 WWII film “Tora! Tora! Tora!” Yamamoto probably did not say in the aftermath of the Pearl Harbor attack, “I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.”
But Yamamoto likely either wrote or said something similar: “I can run wild for six months … after that, I have no expectation of success.”
Yamamoto summed up a general feeling among the Japanese admirals that the huge industrial capacity of the U.S. — which had been asleep during the Great Depression — along with the righteous anger and frenzy of an aroused American democracy would ensure the destruction of the Japanese Empire in short order.
They were right. read more
This is almost too incredible to believe! But today, it’s becoming difficult to discount anything, regardless of how unbelievable it may seem.
from Fox News:
Bloomberg’s cash financing ‘overtly political’ agendas in state AG offices, West Virginia’s Morrisey claims
Billionaire Democrat Michael Bloomberg has bankrolled a network of climate-change lawyers who are operating out of the offices of attorneys general in liberal states, West Virginia state Attorney General Patrick Morrisey claimed Tuesday, calling the Bloomberg setup “absolutely outrageous.”
“[W]hat you are doing is, you’re outsourcing who is running the government to people who are not accountable to the voters,” Morrisey said during an appearance on Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle.” “It’s unacceptable on so many levels.” read more
Mark Levin was on Fox News with Sean Hannity the other night, and gave the best explanation to date about this whole impeachment scam by the democrats.
Here’s the transcript of what Mark said.
Enjoy – unless you’re a Trump-hating leftist.
1. What exactly is the impeachable issue here? The Ukrainian President said no pressure, no quid pro quo. He didn’t even know military aid was temporarily withheld. The President has every right to temporarily withhold military aid for any damn reason he wants to and it’s been done before by other presidents. We have the phone call itself. The President declassified it. You can’t find a single tie between military aid and requests for the 2016 investigation. And even if you do, it’s perfectly legal. But there isn’t. There isn’t.
Now, you can’t ask the Ukrainian government to assist you in the 2016 criminal investigation that’s being led by your Attorney General and U.S. Attorney Durham? Of course you can – even though it might get to the bottom of the Hillary campaign and the DNC that worked with Ukraine in the Obama Administration. First, the United States is free to do that and if he did do that, good for him.
You can’t mention the Bidens? Why? Because Joe Biden is running for office for the 412th time?
Well, Mueller got assistance from 13 governments in his special counsel investigation and I don’t remember hearing a single complaint from anybody. Just because he’s running for office doesn’t mean he’s immune from investigation and the President of the United States said it as passively as possible. Meanwhile, Ukraine got the military aid and the Bidens are still running free. Now you want to talk about interfering with an election. Biden is interfering with an election. He supports impeaching the President. Doesn’t that help his election? The Democrats are interfering with an election. That’s the whole purpose of what they’re doing. They’re trying to reverse the 2016 election and influence the 2020 election. How do I know? This is the first time in American history a process like this, so bastardizing the impeachment clause, has ever been used against a president, a federal judge or any official of the United States government. read more
It seems a bit as was predicted. As Rupert Murdoch divested himself of his Fox holdings and his sons gained more prominence, Fox News would begin to become more liberal. And son-of-a-gun, it looks like it may be happening. So much for fair and balanced.
I been saying for years, not to just accept poll results without first looking into the metrics – how they conducted it, the sample size and the weighting.
By manipulating the metrics, you can make a poll say pretty much anything you want it to. And evidently some at Fox were desirous of just that.
From Western Journalism:
It Now Appears Fox News’ Trump Poll Was Setup in Such a Way That Trump Could Never Win read more
Now what do we think would be the reaction from the press and democrats if this were a judge appointed by a Republican president? That’s right – conflict of interest – recusal – recusal – recusal – constitutional crisis. Yet strangely, all we hear are crickets.
from Fox News:
Judge who upheld Trump subpoena donated to Dems on committee seeking the records
The New York federal judge who ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees has donated in the past to a slew of big-name Democrats — including two who currently sit on those committees, according to federal election filings.
After an hour of oral arguments, Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have “a legitimate legislative purpose,” and that Trump was unlikely to prevail in a lawsuit to quash the requests. Judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias. read more
from the American Spectator:
You Bet Media Matters — and That’s Why Fox News Has to Stand by Its People
Remember when the Left tried to drive Rush Limbaugh off the air seven years ago after he called Sandra Fluke a “slut”? Oh my, how they salivated as they got some advertisers to withdraw ads from Rush’s show! They thought they had Rush off the air. They really did. Carbonite, the computer-data back-up company, made a big splash when they announced they were pulling their ads off Rush. But Rush stuck it out. He stayed strong. And, like the Energizer Bunny, all these years later he still is going and going and going, while history records that Fluke was a fluke. And Carbonite’s stock value nose-dived. read more
by: Brent Smith at the Common Constitutionalist
Scroll Down for Audio Version
Last Week, acting Attorney General Andrew Whitaker was on Capital Hill in front of the House Judiciary panel. He was testifying about pretty much nothing.
As it usually is, this panel was convened in public and on camera as a show. It was reality TV and should be treated by any reasonable American with the same reverence as an episode of Real Housewives.
But that’s what the Democrats said they would do if they took control of the House. And they are as good, or bad, as their word. This was no surprise.
The dems’ goal is to now make life for the President and his administration as miserable as they can. And that’s a shame. For the next two years they will abuse their oversight authority for that sole purpose. This was fully expected for a Party, stuck in the past, still trying to come to grips with the 2016 presidential loss. read more