2012 Voting Rights Act

by: the Common Constitutionalist

Step one in the great election theft of 2012. Through an illegal dictatorial decree (executive order), the Obama Administration will grant amnesty for young illegal immigrants. They won’t call it that but who cares.

This of course is beyond the scope of the president’s constitutional authority. That is of no concern to him or the revolutionaries that surround and advise him. The plan is to immediately stop any deportation efforts and issue work permits to these young lawbreakers. They will attach some pretend conditions on the illegals to make it sound more reasonable. (eg: must have graduated high school.) In order to comply with the federal program, the illegals will, no doubt,  have to register with Homeland Security. 

During a press conference in 2011, the president clearly explained to the press & public, he did not have the authority to just change or disregard the laws regarding illegal immigrants.

They have evidently found a way to just usurp congress & decree it, just as you would expect a dictator to do. Actually, they haven’t found a way around our pesky laws. The administration just doesn’t care. They do these sorts of things all the time, just daring the congress to stop them. Also, in 2011 they didn’t think they would need this block of non-citizens.

Obama explained his reasoning this way: He sent a proposal to congress and they blocked it. He just can’t wait for their approval, so in true constitutional form, he has decided to make it so without congressional approval. He did assure the American people, this would not be a path to citizenship. Although I don’t believe him, I do believe they don’t care whether these poor folks are citizens or not. That is not what they’re after.

I do agree, however, that he can’t wait. It will, after all, take time for all the illegals to sign up for the program.

The Obamites must leave themselves enough time to implement Step two.

Step Two will be a massive voter registration drive. By shear coincidence, these young illegals just happen to be between the ages of 18 & 30. Just old enough to vote & young enough to still be stupid.

As you recall, all of the young illegals had to sign up for work permits. To do so required them to release to the government, their personal contact information including an address and telephone number.

In a way that doesn’t seem possible, these lists will somehow end up in the hands of the “Center for American Progress”, “MoveOn.Org” and/or some “ACORN” type organization.

These organizations will then fan out across the nation to register the unsuspecting voting block. Strong-arm tactics will NOT be used for the registration drive. Threats of deportation will NOT occur, for those who balk at registering to vote, because the new worker knows it is illegal to do so, . There will be NO incentive proposed for registration, such as free sign up for Obamacare.

As I stated, in 2011, Obama said that he simply didn’t have the authority to do this, he was not a Monarch. So what has changed? Certainly not the whole “Monarch” thing. He has always thought that. What has changed is the need for additional votes.

The administration knows it is in real electoral trouble. This leads me to reveal Step Three.

My theory is that they will cheat as much as they have to, to win the popular vote in November. As you may know, whoever wins the electoral vote, wins the election. If Romney wins the electoral vote but Obama can pull out a popular vote victory, his administration and wacko supporters will file so many lawsuits it would cause the country to shut down, not to mention, tearing it apart by fomenting race riots. There have been many factions in the past wanting to just do away with the whole electoral process & replace it with the popular vote only. Hillary Clinton suggested it several years ago.

I guess we’ll just have to see how much congress let’s Obama get away with. I hate to say it, but most of them don’t have the spine to do the right thing and stand up to this bunch.

But, with enough independent light shone on the administration, it may at least, slow them down and possibly wake up a few more legal voters.

Let My People Vote!

by: the Common Costitutionalist

The Huffington Post writes that Attorney General Eric Holder told members of the Congressional Black Caucus and the Conference of National Black Churches last Wednesday that the right to vote was threatened across the country.

“The reality is that in jurisdictions across the country, both overt and subtle forms of discrimination remain all too common and have not yet been relegated to the pages of history,” Holder told the audience, made up of black church and political leaders, during a faith leaders summit in Washington.

Foul! Foul! Separation of Church & State! Sorry; couldn’t resist.

“If a state passes a new voting law and meets its burden of showing that the law is not discriminatory, we will follow the law and will approve that change,” Holder said. (comment: which would be never) “When a jurisdiction fails to meet its burden in proving that a voting change will not have a racially discriminatory effect, we will object.” (comment: which would be always)

Once again, as it always is with this administration, it’s all about race.

HuffPo continues by stating that Voter ID laws, which require voters to present official government identification before they cast a ballot in an elections, have become a hot-button issue this election cycle.

Ooh; official government identification.What is this, Nazi Germany; “Papers Please”. You mean like a driver’s license or non-drivers state I.D.? That official identification?

HuufPo claims that critics of the voter I.D. laws say that the groups most likely to be harmed by the rules — blacks, Latinos, the poor, and college students — are groups that are key parts of the Democratic voting bloc. Name one college student that doesn’t have a photo I.D.?

A study of “Voter Disenfranchisement” was done by the ultra-liberal Brennan Center for Justice. What a shocker, I know. I bet they found all but white males are “disenfranchised”.

Their “study” found the restrictions fall into five major categories: (1) requirements that voters provide specific kinds of government-issued photo ID to vote or have their votes counted; (2) requirements to provide documentary proof of citizenship in order to register and vote; (3) new restrictions on voter registration; (4) cutbacks on the availability of early and absentee voting; and (5) actions permanently depriving previously incarcerated citizens of their right to vote.

So, first you have to prove who you are by showing a photo I.D. Tragic! Get your butt down to the DMV and get an I.D. It costs less than a couple of packs of smokes these days. Heck, some states are starting to give them out. All you have to do is get there.

Second: You have to actually prove that you are a citizen to vote? Those bastards!

Does this sound as asinine to you as it does me?

Third: The new restrictions are that states are finally figuring out the “Same day Registration” nonsense. It makes it harder to cheat when they have time to check. States are also wising up to the phony “ACORN” type registration drives, where dead people,  Mickey Mouse & Abe Lincoln are mysteriously registered to vote.

Fourth: Early voting is a complete crock. It’s not as if election day just sneaks up you. You should kinda know when it comes around. Do voters have no responsibility in this country?

Fifth: They describe it as “incarcerated citizens”. Call them what they are, felons, and almost all can regain their right to vote after they’ve done their time.

The bottom line is, these so-called advocates for the “disenfranchised” just want the right to continue to cheat if they so choose and we are racists if we stand in their way. If any citizen is “disenfranchised”, it is because they choose to be.

I’ve compiled a list of things, off the top of my head, for which one would need a photo I.D. I’m sure there are many more but here are some that come to mind.

To get a job, many employers require to see a photo I.D. You need an I.D. to test drive and purchase a car, to open a bank account, to close a bank account, to buy a house, to rent an apartment, to apply for any loan, to buy booze, to buy cigarettes, to receive welfare, unemployment or food stamps.

 I think that covers folks in all three of the classes in which we like to lump our citizens; Upper class (the evil rich), the sacred middle class and the disenfranchised lower class (the poor).

 As long as one never has to do, or purchase, any of those things, I guess they wouldn’t need an I.D.

Voting should be treated as a privilege in this country. I’ve spoken to more than just a few immigrants from communist countries about this subject. They tell me it’s absurd that so many in this country take the vote for granted. They’re right!

They Like Us, They Really Like Us

from:

Our government thinks that if we give money to nations that want to destroy us that somehow they’ll learn to like us. Don’t believe it. They only think we’re stupid and weak. The money we’ve sent to these backward and violent regimes have only been used to prop up dictators who keep most of the money for themselves. When their rulers are finally overthrown, the people blame the United States for keeping the tyrants in power.

How well did our foreign aid do in Egypt? How is it doing in Syria with the slaughter of innocent children? All foreign aid should be stopped. If wealth redistribution is hurting the poor in the United States, why do we think it’s going to help in other nations? What we should be exporting is a worldview that — moral, religious, economic, and political — that will help these nations transform themselves.

How much support have the following regimes given the United States when it came time for them to vote at the United Nations? (Following this voting list, take a look at how much foreign aid money we dole out to some of these nations):

  1. Kuwait votes against the United States 67% of the time (how quickly they forget)
  2. Qatar votes against the United States 67% of the time
  3. Morocco votes against the United States 70% of the time
  4. United Arab Emirates votes against the United States 70% of the time.
  5. Jordan votes against the United States 71% of the time.
  6. Tunisia votes against the United States 71% of the time.
  7. Saudi Arabia votes against the United States 73% of the time.
  8. Yemen votes against the United States 74% of the time.
  9. Algeria votes against the United States 74% of the time.
  10. Oman votes against the United States 74%of the time.
  11. Sudan votes against the United States 75% of the time.
  12. Pakistan votes against the United States 75% of the time.
  13. Libya votes against the United States 76% of the time.
  14. Egypt votes against the United States 79% of the time.
  15. Lebanon votes against the United States 80% of the time.
  16. India votes against the United States 81% of the time.
  17. Syria votes against the United States 84% of the time.
  18. Mauritania votes against the United States 87% of the time.

United States Foreign Aid to those that hate us:

  1. Egypt, after voting 79% of the time against the United States, still receives $2,000,000,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
  2. Jordan votes 71% against the United States and receives $192,814,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
  3. Pakistan votes 75% against the United States and receives $6,721,000,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
  4. India votes 81%

Term Limits

Although Chuck is focused on California, his home state, it’s instructive none the less. I have seen many deceptive ballot initiatives in my state. The way the ballot is written, you think you’re voting yes for something when you’re really voting no. Make sure you fully understand what you’re voting for or against ahead of time. There is nothing scarier to a politician than an informed electorate.