VP Pick Tim Kaine is Cozy with Islamists

by: the Common Constitutionalist

Hillary Clinton had her pick of leftists and radicals to choose from as her vice presidential running mate. She could’ve gone with the radical Injun Elizabeth Warren – but then two far left radical screeching women might have been too much.

She had her choice of an Hispanic or black or any number of leftists ne’er-do-wells and she could’ve even asked the old socialist curmudgeon Bernie Sanders – but instead chose a middle-of-the-road whitey.

Virginia Senator Tim Kaine is said to be a great choice. It is interesting though that we don’t hear the Democrats, who were all about diversity (when it suits them), complaining about the choice of a cracker – and worse that he is billed as a boring common sense Democrat. But Kaine is neither boring nor common sense.

As we are all aware, radical Islam is on the rise. We see or hear of attacks virtually every day. Left or right, we know this is a growing problem and is sure to be one of the number one issues in the general election. Voters will no doubt judge the two tickets on their stances regarding this issue.

We know, or at least he tells us, where the Trumpster and his running mate stand. If we believe them, they will be tough on terrorism and terrorists. Hillary, as we know, has a sketchy past to put it kindly. But we haven’t heard where Kaine stands on the issue – until now. read more

My WND Weekly Exclusive

Is Newt the right choice for Trump?

The rumor mill is cranking into high gear wondering who Trump is likely to choose as his running mate. So far several names have surfaced.

The L.A. Times wrote, “Trump has benefited from his outsider status, but the billionaire businessman has said his vice-presidential pick will likely have political experience.” And we all know what that means. In case you don’t, this is why having political experience is important to The Donald. He recently told George Stephanopoulos during an interview on “Good Morning America”: “I would like to have somebody who could truly be good with respect to dealing with the Senate and dealing with Congress – getting legislation passed. Working toward something where we’re not signing executive orders every three days like President Obama does.”

read more

Post Debate

by: the Common Constitutionalist

At the start of the Vice Presidential debate, I thought Joe Bidens strategy might be a winner, but his condescension soon started to grate on me. The constant interruption of Paul Ryan was deplorable.

In fact, Biden interrupted Ryan 82 times during the 40 minutes Ryan was able to speak. That’s an interruption approximately every 30 seconds. Way to do your job Martha.

As Rush says, the Joe Biden you saw last night, was the real Joe Biden and the real modern-day democrat party. Mean, arrogant and patronizing.

I don’t know how Ryan felt, but I was worn out, watching Old Uncle Joe (not Stalin; Biden) cackling, grinning, wagging his finger and lecturing me.

I always thought the media, and the left in general, were disgusted by angry old white men. Yet, watching and listening to the main stream and lefty cable shows, post-debate, one would think the democrats were, in fact, the party of angry old white guys.

When discussing Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Ryan repeatedly stressed that they (Iran) had four additional years to develop fissionable materials and thus develop a nuclear weapon.

Biden’s retort was to agree, that Iran has more fissionable material but forcefully stated, “that we have no need to fear because they don’t a weapon to put it in.”

Well, that sure is good news Joe. And, of course, they’ll never find anyone willing to sell them one.

Biden turned to the camera and stated, “ Folks, we’re going to knowwwwww if Iran acquires a weapon.” “WE’LL KNOW!”

Really Joe; you’ll know? Just like you knew that the Benghazi attack was terrorism and not due to a video?

How Joe, will you find out they have a weapon? Will you receive that information from your intelligence community? You know, the one you threw under the bus, when you said they gave you the wrong info regarding Benghazi, and were unable to get you the correct intelligence for a two solid weeks. Is that where you will get the information regarding Iran’s bomb?

I’m not in the intelligence community, but even I could let this administration know two weeks after Iran gets a nuclear weapon.

It will be fairly evidently from the giant crater and nuclear fallout that was Israel.

Also, I would add that terrorists don’t need missiles. All they need are suitcases or backpacks and several brainwashed idiots willing to blow themselves for Allah.

As for the rest of the debate, it was more of the same; Old Joe, smiling, cackling and lying about all of the administrations domestic positions. In between, was Joe’s constant attempt at belittling Paul Ryan. By the close of the debate it was clear that Biden looked the village idiot.

One of the barometers of how well Old Joe did is how much time the mainstream media will continue to spend on breaking the debate down.

If he pulled off a clear and concise victory, the press will be discussing his brilliance up until the second the second presidential debate begins next week.

But the AP (Associated Press) , which, for all intent and purpose, is the media arm of the White House, is already speaking of the next Presidential debate. That debate is still a week away. That tells me they don’t want to discuss Old Joe’s performance. Evidently, the sooner they can put it behind them, the better.

Reports have also surfaced that the debate “Moderator” Martha Raddatz actually visited Old Uncle Joe Biden in the White House sometime prior to the debate. I’m sure it was to just stop by and say howdy and not to discuss the questions she would ask during the debate.

As it turns out Martha did Paul Ryan a huge favor by siding with Old Joe. Martha unwittingly preformed a valuable service to the viewing public by allowing all to see Old Uncle Joe, as he really is, an angry, insipid and shrill liberal.

The old saying is, if someone insists on making a fool of themselves, just get out their way and let them.

Ryan, I thought, may have been a little too polite for my taste, but it worked for him. The consensus opinion is that Paul Ryan won and Joe Biden surely lost, both the debate and his mind.

Romney Changes Mind, New V.P. Pick Is…

Breaking News! by the Common Constitutionalist

This just in! Mitt Romney changes his mind regarding his choice of running mate. In a sudden turnabout, Romney turns his whole campaign on its head.

Paul Ryan is out. Romney said to an anonymous source, he wanted to go in another direction. He claimed to the source, he wanted to get away from the conservative policy man.

His new choice. Jesus Christ.

And not even a Power Tie

Immediately, the democrats sprang to action, with attack ads and pundits flooding the talk circuit. It’s as if they were tipped off prior to the announcement.

The first ad to hit network TV was of Mr. Christ pushing an old woman in a wheel chair over a cliff. When asked, Debbie Blabbermouth Shultz said she was unaware of any ties between the Obama White House and the Superpac that produced the ad. The Superpac claiming responsibility for the ad is relatively new. Not much is known of it.  It does have a fairly lengthy name, so as do most of them , it has an acronym; WNPOAWPac. It evidently stands for, We are Not Part of the Obama Administration – We Promise. 

A panel on MSNBC was convened in short order. Chris Matthews emphatically refuted the republican claims that the selection could cement the ticket thus saving the nation from almost certain destruction. Matthews was unconvinced, stating that there was only one true savior of mankind and he was already in the White house. If you looked closely, during that segment, it appeared Matthews leg actually shivered.

David Axelrod appeared on CNN carrying a fish and a loaf of bread. He publicly challenged the new VP selection to, “Go ahead, feed the masses. I dare you to try without the assistance of the Farm Bill that your party has held up in congress.” 

Late Saturday on NBC news, Andrea Mitchell interviewed Joe Septic, a man who claimed Jesus Christ willingly and with malice, ruined his life. He stated that years ago he suffered from post traumatic stress. Joe stated, “It was severely debilitating and I was unable to function outside the home.”  “From the war?”, asked Andrea. “No, Burger King, replied Mr. Septic. ” You see… this is really hard to relive.” “Take your time, added Andrea. Joe continued, “You see, years back I ordered a double cheeseburger, small fry and a vanilla shake. I picked up my order at the drive through and drove away. It seems they gave me a chocolate shake instead. I called 911. By the time the first responders arrived on the scene, it was too late. The damage to my mind had already been done.” 

A few years later an acquaintance dragged Joe to an event with a relatively unknown motivational speaker. It turned out to be the new VP candidate, Jesus Christ. After the speech, Jesus went out into the crowd to interact with the attendees. Septic said, “Jesus approached me and laid his hand on my head saying he would make me whole again. I never asked him to do it. He just did it. As he walked away, my sanity returned.” Andrea said, ” And you never even asked him? How awful for you. And how did this encountered negatively affect you?” “Well, Ms. Mitchell, I lost all my government benefits and was forced to find a…a….a job.”  Joe added, “I do not think Mr. Christ realizes what he did to me. Furthermore, I do not think Jesus Christ was concerned.”

Andrea Mitchell, known in some circles to be a woman, later reported that Romney’s pick of Jesus was a vote against all suburban moms.  “I think that you’re going to see that they’ve decided that this is a base election. This is not a pick for suburban moms. This is not a pick for women. This is a pick for the base.” Evidently, this Jesus fellow is a pro-lifer.

So there you have it. A move sure to shake things up & according to the media, allow Obama to sail into a second term. For, of course, who in their right (or left) mind would vote for such a ticket.

New Yorker State of Mind

The following article was posted by  at The New Yorker website. At first blush, I was surprised at his myopic view, but then I awoke from my conservative dream-state to recall the source of the piece. Liberals are a mixed up, illogical bunch.

As is my want, I have added editorial comments in [ ].

If tonight’s reporting is correct [ which,of course, it was ] , and if Mitt Romney really does announce at 9 A.M. Saturday that Congressman Paul Ryan of Wisconsin is his running mate, Romney has made the most daring decision of his political career. [Daring? Ryan is a great choice but daring would have been Rand Paul or Allen West]

After spending weeks looking into Ryan’s history for The New Yorker, visiting his home town, and interviewing him twice, I am genuinely surprised that Romney chose him. First, let’s tally the risks of a Ryan pick. [ No,  first let’s ask why NO ONE ever did the same regarding our dear president. No one was (or is) even the slightest bit curious about him ]

For one thing, Ryan has no significant private-sector experience. Besides summer jobs working at McDonald’s or at his family’s construction company, or waiting tables as a young Washington staffer, Ryan has none of the business-world experience Romney frequently touts as essential for governing. In the run-up to his first campaign for Congress, in 1998, that gap was enough of a concern for Ryan that he briefly became a “marketing consultant” at the family business, an obvious bit of résumé puffing. [ Ok, come on now. Even he couldn’t have written this with a straight face. Private-sector experience? Really? Do the names Barack Milhous Obama and Joe Plugs Biden strike a familiar note? My 13-year-old son worked as a camp counselor trainee for 15 days this summer. He now has more private-sector experience than Milhous and Plugs combined. ]

But Ryan’s Washington experience is also light, at least for a potential President—which, after all, is the main job description of a Vice-President. Ryan has worked as a think-tank staffer and Congressman, but he’s never been in charge of a large organization, and he has little experience with foreign policy. Given how Sarah Palin was criticized for her lack of such experience, I’m surprised that Romney would pick someone whose ability to immediately step into the top job is open to question. [ This is comedy gold. A) Washington experience? Obama had 144 work days in the senate from the time of his election until he formed his presidential campaign. B) Are ACORN or the Black Panthers considered large organizations? C) Foreign Policy experience? Obama had exactly zero (other than possibly being a foreign national. Hah! Couldn’t resist) and Biden’s expertise is being wrong about everything ]

And the experience that Ryan does have is not exactly what voters are clamoring for at the moment. The bulk of Ryan’s House career coincided with the Presidency of George W. Bush, during which he was a reliable vote for many Bush policies that have not aged well: Medicare Part D; the Iraq War; and the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Ryan told me that voting for all of that spending, which added trillions to the deficit, made him “miserable,” but he’ll need a better explanation in his October debate with Joe Biden. [ Wow! Something we agree on. To say I didn’t care for the Medicare & TARP programs is an understatement, but those programs will look like a trip to the Dollar Store compared to the cost of Obamacare. Debating Joe, the gaffe machine, Biden? Biden is one of the dimmest bulbs to hold that or any other office ]

Presumably, Romney’s main reason for picking Ryan is not his early deficit-busting record but his more recent rise to celebrity as a crusading policy wonk determined to tame the federal government. Romney, who has been extremely vague about what he would do if elected, will now own Paul Ryan’s ideas, which include privatizing Social Security, turning Medicare into a voucher program, bloc-granting and drastically cutting Medicaid, and reducing discretionary spending to levels that would affect every popular government program. This Ryan agenda will now fill the vacuum created by Romney’s unwillingness to lay out the specifics of his own plan. Even before this (apparent) announcement, Democrats were planning on tying Romney to Ryan’s policy platform. Now Romney has done it for them. [ Possibly saving Social Security by privatizing it, √. Getting people more involved in their own Medicare decisions, √. Block granting to the states to allow them to be more efficient , thus saving money, √. Reducing discretionary spending, another word for waste, fraud and abuse, √ . Nature abhores a vacuum. It can either be filled with big government, progressive spending or free-market capitalism. I hope Romney owns it! ]

So what’s the potential upside? Romney seems to have realized that his spring and summer strategies have been a failure. Since winning the nomination, Romney’s plan has been to turn the election into a simple referendum on Barack Obama. With the ailing economy, Romney believed, he needed to do little more than stand around and wait for voters to sour on the incumbent. When they did, Romney would be there as the default alternative. In recent weeks, as Romney’s favorable ratings declined, some encouraging economic news dribbled out, and Obama’s poll numbers ticked up, a loud faction of Republicans began pointing out that Romney’s theory of the campaign was wrong. Their argument was that Romney needed to turn the race into more of an ideological debate. He needed, these Republicans said, to embrace a bold policy agenda that would dramatically contrast with Obama’s. Nobody made this case more loudly than Paul Ryan. Presidential candidates shouldn’t “run on vague platitudes and generalities,” he told me in one interview. “I want a full-throated defense for an alternative agenda that fixes the country’s problems,” he said in another. [ Referendum on the One? You got that right. That’s exactly what this is. I hope and believe Romney understands the people already in his corner would never vote Obama and the rest aren’t paying attention yet anyway. And it’s only been a failure to those pundits and hacks who believe their own heavily skewed polls. Now they have the ticket, it’s time to go on the attack ]

Romney’s choice of Ryan will undoubtedly be criticized as capitulation to the right, and this pick does seem to demonstrate that Romney is not able or willing to distance himself from the base of his party. But the good thing about the Ryan pick is that the Presidential campaign will instantly turn into a very clear choice between two distinct ideologies that genuinely reflect the core beliefs of the two parties. And in that sense, Romney’s choice of Paul Ryan is good news for voters. [ I hope he knows what side his bread is buttered. The right, the Tea Party, the real conservatives are the ones that have done all the heavy lifting to try to wrest control away from these tyrannical overlords. So far we’ve done a pretty fair job and I’m sure he see’s that.  I feel fairly confident he does ]

Santorum to Gingrich, “How about V.P.?”

By Martin Gould and Ashley Martella of Newsmax [emphasis added]:

Saying he’d look for a “strong and principled conservative” as a running mate should he win the Republican presidential nomination, former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum tells Newsmax that he certainly would consider rival Newt Gingrich for that vital role.

When asked if he would consider the former House Speaker as number two on his ticket, Santorum said Gingrich had been “tested” by the bruising GOP race and that makes him an attractive vice presidential candidate.

Santorum tells Newsmax that his choice would be a core conservative who is “willing to stand up and fight for the things that I believe in.”

“My principal and only criterion for vice president is to make sure that I have someone that I have confidence that if something should happen to me that they could carry on and do what I promised the people of America I would try to do,” he said.

Gingrich would seem to fit the bill more than any of the other candidates. He and Santorum have been battling for the same voters on the right of the party as they try to defeat front-runner Mitt Romney.

Santorum said the GOP only has to look to history to see that conservative candidates do better in general elections that do moderates.

“If we have another moderate Republican we are going to end up with the same situation we had four years ago,” he said, referring to John McCain’s loss to Barack Obama. “We’ll have the same situation we had with Bob Dole and the same situation we had with Gerry Ford.

“You go back. If we nominate conservatives we win. If we nominate moderates we lose. We can’t afford to lose this one.”

Santorum said he is not worried that the latest Rasmussen Reports poll gives Mitt Romney a double-digit lead over him, going into Saturday’s caucuses in Kansas and next week’s primaries in Alabama and Mississippi.

“Three weeks ago I had a double-digit lead and before that he had a double-digit lead and before that Newt Gingrich had a double-digit lead,” he pointed out. “This is an ebb-and-flow campaign.”

He said that Romney has spent some $65 million so far and has had a super PAC spend almost as much, while he only put some $6 million into his campaign.

“The fact that he hasn’t been able to close the deal and get this nomination behind him, that we are very much alive and well and have an opportunity to win this race, is a testament that money does not buy this election.

“Ideas and vision will not just win the primary but more importantly it’s the only chance we have to win the general election,” Santorum added.

The GOP has to nominate “someone who has convictions, someone who tells the truth to the American public, someone who goes out there and lives what he says he is going to do and follows through and has the courage of his convictions and can create a clear contrast with President Obama,” he said.

“I do that. Gov. Romney, in all fairness, is simply not measuring up. The people of America are beginning to see that and that is why we have the opportunity we do.”

Santorum said he is “very hopeful” that he will win Kansas and that he will at least beat Gingrich in the two Deep South states, proving he is the conservative alternative to Romney.

Santorum said Obama’s energy policies are one of the main issues that are preventing the nation getting below 8 percent unemployment. “It can be summed up in two letters,” he said. “N-O.

“We have literally 60 billion barrels of gas and oil off the coasts of this country and this administration is saying, ‘No, we are not going to go there.’ Shutting down federal lands for good, not voting the Keystone pipeline, not opening up Alaska – all of that is driving up energy prices, which is slowing down this economy and crushing it with a high-energy cost burden.”

The former senator from Pennsylvania said he would repeal costly regulations on businesses and simplify the tax system, and that too would add jobs.

I would cut the corporate rate of tax to zero and say to every manufacturer not just in this country but around the world, bring your business here; expand your business because we want to make things here in America again.”

He also made it clear that he is vehemently opposed to forcing religious institutions to have health insurance plans that cover contraception.

“It’s bad enough to impose a new rule making everybody buy insurance but the idea that they are going to force people to buy insurance on products that they have moral objections to is truly government run amok,” he explained.

And Santorum said that if there is enough GOP support in November to elect him, then the party can get at least 50 seats in the Senate.

“We’ll have the wherewithal to be able to strip all the funding and fines and fees out of Obamacare and make it basically a dead letter,” he vowed.

“That can be accomplished within a few months.”