WND Exclusive – U.N.’S LOVE FOR ANTI-ISRAEL HATE GROUPS

Once again, the little Satan, Israel, has drawn the short straw on the world stage.

Hatred for Israel at the United Nations has been common knowledge for decades. Per capita, there may be more Israel-hating anti-Semites roaming the halls of the august Turtle Bay facility than in Iran.

 Thankfully, President Trump is doing something about it. He should be congratulated for pulling America out of the corrupt UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

read more

Why Ya Gotta Hate Them Jews

by: the Common Constitutionalist

Scroll Down for Audio Version

Obama’s lame-duck, post-election wind-down isn’t exactly that. In fact, it’s just the opposite, and I’m not sure what more he can do to undermine the next president or the nation – but I am sure he and his team of miscreants will think of something.

He’s already rolled out new regulations in an attempt to kill off the coal industry for good. He’s forced States to forever fund Abortion, Inc. – also known as Planned Parenthood. He’s placed areas in the Arctic and Atlantic oceans “permanently” off limits to exploration and drilling and commuted over 1,000 sentences of criminals in federal prisons, of which 342 had life sentences. That will work out well for the communities they end up in.

While taking care of one enemy – the America way – Obama has now set his sights on enemy number two…Israel. I suppose he’s mastered multi-tasking.

As most are aware by now, there was a vote to condemn Israel and ban the nation from building settlements in East Jerusalem. The United States, who is supposed to be Israel’s number one ally, abstained. America could have vetoed the resolution, which would have killed it, but instead, Obama instructed U.N. Ambassador and leftist radical, Samantha Powers, wife of ultra-radical leftist Cass Sunstein, to withhold America’s vote. So rather than a 15-0 predictable vote against Israel – it was only 14-0. read more

A Letter from the U.N.’s Latest Eco-Conference

from: Craig Rucker at CFACT:

Why does the UN hate your house?

Friend,

After spending two days at the UN’s Habitat III in Ecuador, it is abundantly clear the Greens are not hip on the American dream.

For many gathered here, the notion that it’s a good thing to own a home with a nice front lawn and two car garage is akin to admitting it’s o.k. to smoke cigarettes, drive an SUV, or worse yet … vote for a conservative.

What do they have against the American dream? Well in listening to them it seems to be clear they don’t trust people to be able to make the “right” decisions. They need the UN’s guiding hand to show them the path to eco-topia.

I heard this for myself when attending a briefing today (with what I might say had the somewhat troubling title) called “Metropolitan Governance: Multi-Level Coordination for Comprehensive Territorial and Urban Planning.” One of the leaders of the panel from New York’s New University seemed excited by the idea that he could organize cadres of students to monitor and collect data to turn over to government leaders so they could better manage their subjects.

The chairman of another meeting called “Contextualizing and Inspiring Sustainability in the New Urban Agenda” called for “radical” measures in our cities to change their patterns of behavior in order to fend off climate change.

And yet another conference titled “The Role of Media in Building Better Cities” was all about influencing the power of the fourth estate to spread the message of doom and gloom and move the citizenry to an acceptance of green dogma. CFACT policy analyst Bonner Cohen gives more details in his article on the second day’s events at CFACT.org.

Yes, to those gathered here in Ecuador it’s all about control – whether it’s cramming people into dense urban dwellings, forcing them to use public transportation, or limiting their use of electricity to stop global warming, the leaders of Habitat III want to call the shots.

Of course the record of pursuing a path of heavy-handed government management over human affairs is an abysmal one – whether it’s undertaken in China, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea or the former Soviet Union.. Human liberty and free markets have always provided better results. And while most of those at Habitat III aren’t open to hearing this, the good news is … some are – particularly in the developing world. I look forward to telling you more about that later.

In the meantime, be sure to follow CFACT’s ongoing coverage of the events here in Quitoat CFACT.org.

For nature and people too,

Don’t forget to visit CFACT  for all the news of the wacky enviro-leftists.

 

Podcast – Texas Valedictorian is an Illegal Alien – California Inmate Demands to Become a Woman – The U.N. is Blackmailed

In this episode I discuss a female Valedictorian from a Texas High School, who appears to be the model American citizen – except she isn’t. She’s an illegal alien, not quietly living in the shadows as we’ve been told by so many on the left. Instead she proudly and unashamedly tweeted she was “undocumented.”

In segment two I discuss the absurd state of California – how an inmate, in prison for life has demanded and has been granted by Federal Judge the right to have the state pay for his gender-reassignment surgery. And the insanity doesn’t stop there.

Segment three concerns the United Nations and its Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, allowing itself to be extorted by Saudi Arabia. The country was to be blacklisted by the U.N. for their role in the conflict in Yemen, but the Saudis threatened to pull their funding and leave the United Nations if Ban didn’t relent and switch his position. I wonder what happened. read more

Podcast – The Muslim Colonization of the UN – Elite Hackers Say They Can Access iPhone Data

In this episode I discuss the expansion of Muslim prayer in the United Nations General Assembly Building and their refusal to use the designated meditation room set aside since 1957 for that express purpose. Some would say the UN is being colonized by Muslims.

In segment two I discuss the ongoing feud between our government and Apple computer over the FBI’s demand that Apple create a back door into the San Bernardino terrorist’s iPhone. The tech world is afraid this will set a precedent to allow abuse of citizens from the government, but one tech eccentric says he and his team will do the job for free. read more

Obama to America: We Don’t Need No Stinking Vetting

by: the Common Constitutionalist

Well, my man Ted Cruz, who has now vaulted past Marco Rubio into third place in the latest Fox News poll, has echoed the thoughts of many of us right thinking Americans. He said in response to Obama’s continued want to bring jihadists, I mean refugees, to the U.S.: “I have to say particularly in light of what happened in Paris, that’s nothing short of lunacy.”

But not so fast Ted. Didn’t you hear – all these thousands of jihadists, I mean refugees, will be fully vetted.

But really – what’s a vetting? Nadal Hassan, the Fort Hood shooter, was a major in the Army. Who among us has gone through more thorough vetting than those in the military? Yet Hassan somehow escaped the scrutiny of military vetting. Some (me) would say purposely, all in the name of political correctness, which, as it did, always ends in disaster.

That being said, who believes the vetting procedure of these Syrian refugees will be more stringent than that of Hassan?

How well was Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez vetted? Remember him – the illegal alien monster who gunned down Kate Steinle in cold blood, in broad daylight, in front of her father. He was deported 5 times and had used 30 aliases. I guess the vetting process really broke down in his case.

The fact is, we don’t vet illegals. We can’t vet illegals. What kind of electronic, “biometric” trail will you find on some destitute itinerant farm hand from nowhere Guatemala? Of course – not a single thing. And the same will go for most of the “refugees” from Syria. We are to take the word of the refugee and the U.N. read more

Western Leaders Show Arrogance on Climate

by: the Common Constitutionalist

Why did I think German Chancellor Angela Merkel might be the voice of reason when it came to discussing global warming? I guess I just figured that of all the failing European economies, Germany’s was probably failing the least and why would they drive a stake through their own hard after witnessing the economic catastrophe that the green agenda wreaked on neighboring Spain.

But when it comes to the church of climate change, virtually all Europeans have become parishioners. And it seems the Chancellor is now leading the pack, as reported by Politico yesterday. They wrote that “German Chancellor Angela Merkel won a significant victory in persuading the rest of the G-7 to adopt ambitious emissions targets ahead of December’s Paris climate summit.”

And what is this ambitious target? She got the G-7 to agree to “limit the increase in global temperatures to a maximum of 2°C above preindustrial levels…”

Okay – I wasn’t aware that the G-7 leaders recently relocated to Mount Olympus to become omnipotent beings. But that must be their plan if they think they can, I simply stating the goal, somehow limit what the Earth is naturally done for eons. It’s that or our world leaders have taken the combination of arrogance and stupidity to a height not witnessed in history. read more

Not Quite the Same Outrage

by: the Common Constitutionalist

Remember this?

May 14, 2005: In Pakistan, Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) President Qazi Hussain Ahmad said that desecration of the Holy Quran is a desecration of the whole Muslim Ummah.

Ahmad’s MMA contacted Islamic movements all over the world to organize protests and he added that a mammoth protest rally would be held in Islamabad.

And what was all this uproar over? As you may recall, the outrage was spawned from a Quran being flushed down a toilet at Gitmo. Only problem – it never happened. That didn’t seem to matter.

Like you, I remember Muslims being apoplectic over it and the left going bananas, repeating the bogus Newsweek report as if it were gospel. The hand wringing and apologies over the non-incident were so over-the-top as to be almost comical. Those who had nothing at all to do with any of the supposed incidences of abuse were both apologetic to the Muslim world and infuriated at the Christian west.

And how about Abu Ghraib where detainees were forced to wear women’s underwear. Oh the horror! There of course was world wide condemnation of such treatment, with still more protests by outraged Muslims.

Yet I don’t see or hear that same global indignation over the barbaric acts perpetrated by radical Islamists on Christians or their holy property. read more

The UN Human Rights Council Is a Joke

by: the Common Constitutionalist

 

The UNHRC, the United Nations Human Rights Council, met last week for a session in Geneva.

 

Before discussing the UNHRC, I’m going to rant for a bit about the UN in general.

 

Can we, once and for all, just dissolve the United Nations?! They have proven, time after time, that they are no friend of the United States and certainly the enemy of our only true ally in the Middle East, Israel.

 

Over the years, we’ve paid the majority of the dues and the UN building itself sits upon some of the world’s most prized real estate.

 

Yet this odd collection of nanny socialists and despots continually blames us and especially Israel for most of the world’s problems. read more

Lurch Signs the Arms Treaty

by: the Common Constitutionalist

 

Without a lot of fanfare, Secretary of State, John “Lurch” Kerry signed away our gun rights here in America, with his signature on the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT).

This treaty has been hanging out there for years, just waiting for an appropriately liberal U.S. regime to sign on. I guess they finally found one who is more concerned with the “World” community than our own.

In 2012 the ATT’s Coordinated Action on Small Arms (CASA) paper explained that the U.N., “does not aim to impede or interfere with the  lawful ownership and use of weapons”, but that, “United  Nations agencies have come across many situations in which various  types of  conventional weapons have been…misused by lawful owners” and that the  “arms trade must therefore be regulated in ways that would…minimize the risk of misuse of legally owned weapons.”

The language of the paper is unchanged in 2013. Also, notice it says “does not aim to impede. Not that it will/shall not impede. Interesting loop hole. “We didn’t aim to confiscate your weapons. It just happened.”

Reuters had it’s typically leftist take on the subject. Some excerpts below with my comments in [ ].

Reuters: The United States, the world’s No. 1 arms exporter, became the 91st country to sign when U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry put pen to paper on the sidelines of the annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations. [ This was a monumental event. I wonder why he didn’t have a publicized signing ceremony, front and center? ]

Kerry Said: “We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution.” [ Huh? For decades we have not been party to this terrible treaty John. ]

Another 16 nations signed on Wednesday, raising the total to 107, and two more countries ratified the treaty, raising that number to six, Bishop said. Fifty countries need to ratify the treaty for it to enter into force. [ This will be another straw dog they throw out, that even if we do ratify it, it won’t be in force because they need another 46 countries. Don’t believe it. ]

“This treaty will not diminish anyone’s freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes,” Kerry said after signing the treaty. [How dumb do they think we are? Let me answer that. They think we are too stupid not to be able to read between the lines when Lurch says “to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes”. Who decides what “legitimate” is? Of course, the dictators at the U.N. and the Marxists in the Obama administration. That’s who.]

“Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution,” Kerry insisted. [ Do you believe him? You’d be a fool to.]

“The Obama administration is politically committed to ending the unscrupulous trade in deadly weapons used by dictators, war lords and criminal gangs to commit atrocities,” said Amnesty International USA deputy executive director Frank Jannuzi. [ Sending tons (literally) of weapons to al-Qaeda affiliates in Syria is somehow not unscrupulous, I guess.] end Reuters.

 Here’s the bottom line folks.  Get out your pocket Constitution. Refer to Article II, section 2, paragraph 2: “The President… shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur….” It’s in the Constitution people, which means that if the Senate consents with a two thirds majority, it is automatically considered constitutional. Get it?! This is why these treaties are so dangerous.

Once again we must start calling our Senators to make sure they don’t “consent” to this.