Video Podcast – The Razor Blade Cheese Steak – Schiff’s Surveillance State – Love for Biden

Cop Finds Razor Blade is his Cheese Steak

Police are investigating how a razor blade made its way into a sandwich after an NYPD officer was injured when he bit into it.

Yes, the razor blade just “made its way” into the sandwich. We see it happen all the time. About as often as a gun, sitting on a table just leaps up and kills someone.

Big city police officers all ready have a thankless enough job. Now they’re having lethal objects stuffed in their food?

Schiff’s Surveillance State

Adam is a one man investigative wrecking crew, who is seemingly doing whatever he wants, without restraint to bring president Trump. His shady tactics would be the envy of Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Propaganda Minister.

He recently released the phone logs of calls between Devin Nunes and Rudy Giuliani, and others, indicating just the time and duration of the calls. This is supposed to be scandalous and proof of malfeasance.

But when we look at the calls, we see the two spent almost all their time playing phone tag. Not exactly a crime.

More Excuses for Biden

Ana Navarro, a “Republican strategist,” was recently on The View, making excuses for Joe Biden’s latest outburst against an audience member who dared to challenge him.

Navarro, a swamp rat and never-Trumper, thought it was great practice for when dealing with Trump should Joe win the nomination. read more

WND Exclusive – Who cares about Hunter Biden’s strip-club escapades?

from Brent Smith for World Net Daily:

This is a news story? Hunter Biden apparently smoked crack? And did so in a strip club? How quintessentially American.

Wow! How are we expected to react to this “breaking” news? “We’ve got ‘im now,” or some such nonsense? Are we supposed to revel in someone else’s misfortune? Is that it?

We sound like the left!

I can see how some of these more right-leaning click-bait sites might post stuff like this. But how is this new groundbreaking morsel germane to anything, and why are respected conservative news sites at all interested in this tabloid garbage? read more

Just how many are Involved in this Anti-Trump Campaign?

After all this, if not one, but a whole bunch of democrats don’t go to prison over the attempted treasonous overthrow of a branch of the government, there is no justice in the world. Simply allowing anyone involved to get off with suffering the maximum punishment allowed under the law is a miscarriage of justice. This was/is an attempted coup of monumental proportions!

from Zero Hedge:

Brennan’s Spy? New Theories Emerge About Trump-Ukraine Whistleblower

As Democrats seek to impeach President Trump over the “high crime” of asking Ukraine to investigate his political opponents, theories have emerged suggesting the whole thing is a ‘six ways from Sunday‘ operation by Intelligence Community holdovers and Establishment Democrats to remove a sitting President who started flying too close to the sun.

After Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart on July 25 to investigate pro-Clinton Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 US election, and allegations of corruption against Joe Biden and his son Hunter, a CIA officer who worked with the ‘DNC meddler’ and Joe Biden filed a second-hand whistleblower complaint on a recently altered form (which previously allowed only first-hand information). read more

There is NO Impeachable Offense!

Mark Levin was on Fox News with Sean Hannity the other night, and gave the best explanation to date about this whole impeachment scam by the democrats.

Here’s the transcript of what Mark said.

Enjoy – unless you’re a Trump-hating leftist.

1. What exactly is the impeachable issue here? The Ukrainian President said no pressure, no quid pro quo. He didn’t even know military aid was temporarily withheld. The President has every right to temporarily withhold military aid for any damn reason he wants to and it’s been done before by other presidents. We have the phone call itself. The President declassified it. You can’t find a single tie between military aid and requests for the 2016 investigation. And even if you do, it’s perfectly legal. But there isn’t. There isn’t.

Now, you can’t ask the Ukrainian government to assist you in the 2016 criminal investigation that’s being led by your Attorney General and U.S. Attorney Durham? Of course you can – even though it might get to the bottom of the Hillary campaign and the DNC that worked with Ukraine in the Obama Administration. First, the United States is free to do that and if he did do that, good for him.

You can’t mention the Bidens? Why? Because Joe Biden is running for office for the 412th time?

Well, Mueller got assistance from 13 governments in his special counsel investigation and I don’t remember hearing a single complaint from anybody. Just because he’s running for office doesn’t mean he’s immune from investigation and the President of the United States said it as passively as possible. Meanwhile, Ukraine got the military aid and the Bidens are still running free. Now you want to talk about interfering with an election. Biden is interfering with an election. He supports impeaching the President. Doesn’t that help his election? The Democrats are interfering with an election. That’s the whole purpose of what they’re doing. They’re trying to reverse the 2016 election and influence the 2020 election. How do I know? This is the first time in American history a process like this, so bastardizing the impeachment clause, has ever been used against a president, a federal judge or any official of the United States government. read more

Joe Biden’s Apology Tour Begins with a History Rewrite

from the Federalist:

Joe Biden Should Apologize To Clarence Thomas, Not To Anita Hill

History becomes myth, myths become legends, and legends become unquestionable. And if a biased media is writing the story, even dubious tales can turn into unassailable “fact” with the right combination of narrative and time. This has been the case with Anita Hill.

Hill’s testimony alleging that Clarence Thomas, then a nominee for the Supreme Court, repeatedly harassed her in the workplace made for explosive politics back in 1991. It’s reemerging as an issue in 2019 thanks to the new presidential candidacy of Joe Biden. As senator, Biden chaired the Judiciary Committee, and in the eyes of the Democratic voters he hopes to court, he permitted too many tough questions attempting to ascertain the truth from Hill. read more

WND Exclusive – Will Michelle be the Belle of the Democratic Field?

from Brent Smith for World Net Daily:

A few days ago, Rush Limbaugh, on his radio program, was discussing a theory that Michelle Obama may be thinking about throwing her hat into the presidential ring. He discussed how it might happen and why.

Personally, I don’t think there’s any way this will happen. I’ll give a quick thought on this later in the column.

But I’d rather speak of the few current front-runners – Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. All have issues that should disqualify them from even consideration by the leftist base. Yet it continues to be a fascination how the democrats are so easily able to suspend their own identity politics and support two old white guys and the descendant of a slave owner. read more

Biden’s Son Lands Billion Dollar Deal

from Steadfast & Loyal:

Yes Indeed!

BREAKING: AFTER BIDEN TAKES SON TO CHINA, HE LANDS 1.5 BILLION DOLLAR DEAL WITH KERRY’S STEPSON

It must be nice to be a child of royalty especially when daddy is a Democrat devoid of inhibitions and prone to breaking the law. In 2013, Joe Biden took his son to China with him and two weeks later China cuts him and Chris Heinz, stepson of John Kerry in on a 1.5 billion dollar deal. Hunter Biden and Chris Heinz were cut into the deal partnering with the Chinese bank and merging with Biden’s Rosemont Seneca Partners. The new entity known as Rosemont Seneca Bohai, was a yuge deal for Biden. At the time of the deal Biden was VP and Kerry was Secretary of State.

Breitbart reported: read more

What Good is a Dialogue?

by: Brent Smith at the Common Constitutionalist:

Scroll Down for Audio Version

How many times have we heard this repeated, by politicians, pundits, activists, etc.?

“We need to have a dialogue…” – or “we need to have a national discussion…” It’s repeated incessantly from those on the left and the right, in an effort to score cheap political points.

“We need to have a discussion about racism.” “We need a real dialogue about gun control” – as opposed to a fake dialogue. “We need an honest immigration debate.”

These are easy throw-away soundbites. They roll off the tongue, dripping with false empathy.

Yet time after time, we see the irony played out, when someone on the right is willing to put themselves out there and do just that, only to have radicals on the left attempt to shut him or her down.

It happened again just last week, in where else – California. This time anarchists took a break from Berkeley, and assembled at the University of California at Los Angeles. And in the irony of all ironies, they shut down a panel discussion on…wait for it… “civil discourse.” Yes – the “lets have a dialogue” crowd was shut down for trying to “have a dialogue.” read more

How is that Cancer Moonshot Progressing?

by: the Common Constitutionalist

Scroll Down for Audio Version

Recognizing, as I’m sure we all do, that every speech Barack Obama has ever given is a work of oratory genius and each monologue is more memorable than the last, I ask that you think back to his final State of the Union speech.

Amongst the ramblings from one statist government giveaway to the next, was a segment on what the President classified as the White House Cancer Moonshot. Obama stated on January 12, 2016 that, “last year Vice President Biden said that with a new moonshot, America can cure cancer.”

I’m not making light of this statement, and certainly not of Biden, for he lost his son Beau Biden to brain cancer in May of 2015.

Obama continued by saying that, “last month he [Biden] worked with Congress to give scientists at the National Institutes of Health, the strongest resources they’ve had in over a decade.” He received a standing ovation from virtually ever member in the chamber.

This is my problem. Not that Biden lost his son to cancer and wishes for no one else to suffer the way his son and family did. I get that. It’s the way almost everyone in government proposes to solve the problem. It’s always the same. The federal government ponies up billions of dollars of our money to fund quasi-government science projects, which rarely if ever accomplish anything. read more

The Fate of Hillary and Joe Was Always Obama’s Decision

by: the Common Constitutionalist

How is it that people – supposed political experts – can’t figure out why Joe Biden isn’t running? On the radio yesterday, Sean Hannity opened his show with utter astonishment over the announcement by crazy Uncle Joe that he would not be running for president.

Sean said he couldn’t understand what the last several days were all about. What was all the build up for Biden’s announcement all about, if he was just going to declare he wasn’t running?

And he’s not the only one. CNN was on the TV in the locker at the gym yesterday, and the host of whatever the show was also surprised by the news.

This, in my opinion, was how it was always going to go. Biden was only going to get into the presidential race if the Obama administration was prepared to indict Hillary over either Benghazi or her email server scandal, or both – although probably never over Benghazi. Obama could possibly be dragged into that one.

Hannity said he was also confused to hear Trey Gowdy seemingly back off of his strong position regarding questioning Hillary at the upcoming Benghazi hearings that begin this morning. Pundits think it may be the undermining comments of House Majority Leader Kevin “sour grapes” McCarthy’s that the hearings are more about Hillary’s election bid than anything else.

Could be, but it really doesn’t matter what Gowdy, or any member of Congress says or does. It wouldn’t even matter if Hillary walked in and admitted she lied about everything under the sun and even personally told Ambassador Stevens he was being left for dead, and that the communiqué was classified top secret and it was indeed on her personal server. read more