Schiff’s Next Smoking Gun?

by: Brent Smith

The left is pinning all its hope on John Bolton. He is the latest “smoking gun.”

Honestly – it must be exhausting having to jump around from one smoking gun to the next. Their collective heads must be swimming by now.

How do they keep it all straight? I mean, we are so far afield from their original complaint, assuming you even remember, and I can’t blame you if you don’t. Recall that it was Trump who colluded with Russia, thus allowing Russia to tamper with the 2016 election. And due to the tampering, allowed Trump to “somehow” beat Hillary. Since Hillary wasn’t supposed to lose, Trump must have committed a crime to pull it off.

Remember that? In April of 2019, Adam Schiff stated unequivocally that there is, “ample evidence of collusion in plain sight.”

For how long did Schiff just hammer away at the “collusion” narrative? Yet all of a sudden, during that same April interview with ABC This Week’s Martha Raddatz, Schiff appeared to subtly switch to a new narrative – Obstruction of Justice! read more

The Saga of Schiff T. Coyote

This is an instant classic. And if you love the old Bugs Bunny and Road Runner cartoons, you’ll appreciate it even more.

However, due to completely ridiculous, unrealistic and impossible cartoon violence, the following video may not be suitable for some young children, or all snowflake leftists. The hopelessly and perpetually offended crowd may find that viewing this CARTOON is simply too violent and may cause permanent psychological and possibly physiological damage.

You’ve been Warned!

Roll the Tape: read more

Schiff’s Plan to Sway Republicans

from the American Thinker:

Two hours of dog barking: Adam Schiff tries to bore us into Getting Trump

Adam Schiff is a man of very peculiar reasoning. Like a dolt shouting louder at a foreign-language speaker in a bid to make him ‘understand,’ Schiff’s decided that if he just keeps speaking long enough, we will all suddenly turn into anti-Trumpsters and throw Trump from office. read more

Is Adam Schiff Really a Lying Dirtbag?

So Congressman Adam Schiff is a lying dirtbag – so says Glenn Beck.

In some parts of the country, them’s fightin words!

But is Glenn correct, or is he just another angry right wing extremist, jealous of Schiff’s obviously superior legal mind and oratory acumen.

Let’s watch Glenn attempt to make his feeble argument in defense of this outrageous claim: read more

Imagine if You Will: Adam Schiff Lied.

Imagine if you will: Adam Schiff lied.
I know – it’s so far fetched that it’s like an episode of the Twilight Zone.
What’s next? Will we discover that all the rest of the democrats also lie? Nancy Pelosi, Jerry Nadler, Chuck Schumer – they all lie? That would be almost to much to fathom.
I for one don’t believe it. He just seems like a salt-of-the-Earth kinda guy.
But evidently, it is so, so we best just all come to grips.

from the Right Scoop:

BREAKING: New report suggests Schiff LIED about Parnas evidence…

There’s a report out tonight that suggests that Nancy Pelosi’s favorite Intel Chief Adam Schiff lied about a text from Lev Parnas, suggesting he was trying to get a meeting with Zelensky for Giuliani: read more

Video Podcast – The Razor Blade Cheese Steak – Schiff’s Surveillance State – Love for Biden

Cop Finds Razor Blade is his Cheese Steak

Police are investigating how a razor blade made its way into a sandwich after an NYPD officer was injured when he bit into it.

Yes, the razor blade just “made its way” into the sandwich. We see it happen all the time. About as often as a gun, sitting on a table just leaps up and kills someone.

Big city police officers all ready have a thankless enough job. Now they’re having lethal objects stuffed in their food?

Schiff’s Surveillance State

Adam is a one man investigative wrecking crew, who is seemingly doing whatever he wants, without restraint to bring president Trump. His shady tactics would be the envy of Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Propaganda Minister.

He recently released the phone logs of calls between Devin Nunes and Rudy Giuliani, and others, indicating just the time and duration of the calls. This is supposed to be scandalous and proof of malfeasance.

But when we look at the calls, we see the two spent almost all their time playing phone tag. Not exactly a crime.

More Excuses for Biden

Ana Navarro, a “Republican strategist,” was recently on The View, making excuses for Joe Biden’s latest outburst against an audience member who dared to challenge him.

Navarro, a swamp rat and never-Trumper, thought it was great practice for when dealing with Trump should Joe win the nomination. read more

Will the Trial of the Century Actually Take Place?

by: Brent Smith

No Audio Version

When the democrat hacks in the House of Representatives get around to fabricating whatever charges of impeachment against the president, it of course then goes on to the Senate to be tried.

To recap, the House’s only responsibility is to bring, or in this case makeup charges, or Articles of Impeachment – similar to an indictment.

Then it moves to the Senate for trial and judgment, and is overseen by supreme Court Chief Justice, John “ObamaCare” Roberts.

Regardless of what the charges are, anyone who has paid attention to the actual facts, and watched Glenn Beck’s Ukraine timeline videos, Part OnePart TwoPart Three, understands that whatever the charges leveled against the president, all will be bogus – completely fabricated. Just like Adam Schiff’s soliloquy at the hearing in September.

Recall he made people believe he was reading directly from the transcript of the phone call between Trump and the Ukrainian president. Of course he made it up. But his purpose was just to advance a narrative of guilt, knowing that most low-information citizens wouldn’t read the transcript or even inquire about it. And, for the most part, he got away with it, as spineless and/or ignorant republicans, seated right next to him, never called him on it until days later. read more

Impeachment will Implode on Democrats

from the New York Sun:

Sordid Ruse Is All That’s Left Of Impeachment

You may read it here first: This sordid, contemptible impeachment ruse is finally disintegrating. It was another fraud, and I predict that this time the polls will move clearly in the president’s favor. There are limits to how often his enemies can get the public and the world to the edges of their chairs with their fantastic accusations.

The Economist, a long-respected magazine in earlier times, told us a year ago that the Trump presidency was hanging on the thread of Michael Cohen’s testimony. Most of the American press gave the public to understand for two years that there was a high chance that he would be thrown out once the Mueller investigation established his “treasonous” links to the Russians. read more

Just how many are Involved in this Anti-Trump Campaign?

After all this, if not one, but a whole bunch of democrats don’t go to prison over the attempted treasonous overthrow of a branch of the government, there is no justice in the world. Simply allowing anyone involved to get off with suffering the maximum punishment allowed under the law is a miscarriage of justice. This was/is an attempted coup of monumental proportions!

from Zero Hedge:

Brennan’s Spy? New Theories Emerge About Trump-Ukraine Whistleblower

As Democrats seek to impeach President Trump over the “high crime” of asking Ukraine to investigate his political opponents, theories have emerged suggesting the whole thing is a ‘six ways from Sunday‘ operation by Intelligence Community holdovers and Establishment Democrats to remove a sitting President who started flying too close to the sun.

After Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart on July 25 to investigate pro-Clinton Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 US election, and allegations of corruption against Joe Biden and his son Hunter, a CIA officer who worked with the ‘DNC meddler’ and Joe Biden filed a second-hand whistleblower complaint on a recently altered form (which previously allowed only first-hand information). read more

There is NO Impeachable Offense!

Mark Levin was on Fox News with Sean Hannity the other night, and gave the best explanation to date about this whole impeachment scam by the democrats.

Here’s the transcript of what Mark said.

Enjoy – unless you’re a Trump-hating leftist.

1. What exactly is the impeachable issue here? The Ukrainian President said no pressure, no quid pro quo. He didn’t even know military aid was temporarily withheld. The President has every right to temporarily withhold military aid for any damn reason he wants to and it’s been done before by other presidents. We have the phone call itself. The President declassified it. You can’t find a single tie between military aid and requests for the 2016 investigation. And even if you do, it’s perfectly legal. But there isn’t. There isn’t.

Now, you can’t ask the Ukrainian government to assist you in the 2016 criminal investigation that’s being led by your Attorney General and U.S. Attorney Durham? Of course you can – even though it might get to the bottom of the Hillary campaign and the DNC that worked with Ukraine in the Obama Administration. First, the United States is free to do that and if he did do that, good for him.

You can’t mention the Bidens? Why? Because Joe Biden is running for office for the 412th time?

Well, Mueller got assistance from 13 governments in his special counsel investigation and I don’t remember hearing a single complaint from anybody. Just because he’s running for office doesn’t mean he’s immune from investigation and the President of the United States said it as passively as possible. Meanwhile, Ukraine got the military aid and the Bidens are still running free. Now you want to talk about interfering with an election. Biden is interfering with an election. He supports impeaching the President. Doesn’t that help his election? The Democrats are interfering with an election. That’s the whole purpose of what they’re doing. They’re trying to reverse the 2016 election and influence the 2020 election. How do I know? This is the first time in American history a process like this, so bastardizing the impeachment clause, has ever been used against a president, a federal judge or any official of the United States government. read more