by Brent Smith for World Net Daily:
When pandemics strike, logically where will they do the most damage? Of course, in areas with the highest concentration of population. It’s no different than any disaster or frankly even a war. During World War II, for example, bombing cities obviously inflicted much more damage and hardship than striking farmland.
Looking at any map of coronavirus concentration, it’s plain to see where the outbreak spikes are occurring.
If you guessed in most major cities, you’d be correct. This is a perfectly logical and reasonable conclusion, even before looking at a map. After all, a close-proximity communicable virus will spread more effectively with a population that must remain in, well, close proximity.
The virus is bound to spread from host to host while walking city streets, living in mega-unit high-rise apartment complexes, riding public transportation and just generally being closer to one another.
It’s just a fact of life when living in a big city where millions reside and work.
Some may call this enigmatic, but it’s not. It was/is entirely predictable.
Shoehorn millions of people into a relatively tiny, cramped space. Add a dash of infectious disease or virus – and what do you think is going to occur?
So who’s to blame for this – if anyone? Is it the Chinese government?
The short answer is yes. They introduced it to the rest of the unsuspecting world.
Or maybe it’s really no ones fault. Maybe it’s just the way things are. Maybe people just naturally migrate to large urban areas and this is the occasional result.
However, that is never good enough. Someone must be to blame.
Well, other than the Chicoms, if we had to lay blame, even partially, maybe we should look at leftist progressives. And not any leftists, but the radical leftists at the United Nations.