by: the Common Constitutionalist
Paris is attacked – attacked by Islamic barbarians bent on revenge for mocking the prophet Mohammed. They felt as though they needed to defend the honor and name of the prophet.
As an aside, if Mohammed is supposed to be the father of Islam, the right hand of Allah, like some omniscient being – why does he need to be defended? Why would anyone or anything who is supposed to have a direct line to Allah have to be defended by mere mortals? Just asking.
The city of Paris host a massive “unity rally in defiance of a terrorist spree that claimed 17 lives,” reports CNN.
And it was quite the impressive rally with many dignitaries in attendance. Leaders from France, Germany, Spain, Great Britain were in attendance, as well as Netanyahu of Israel, the Palestinian Authority’s Abbas and the King of Jordan, amongst others.
Now I don’t mean to sound harsh and non-appreciative of the large show of “unity” and “defiance” – but now what? So they have a rally. So what? Is that supposed to scare away the Islamic radicals?
Sean Hannity has repeatedly reported on the over 750 Islamic No Go Zones in Europe alone. For those who are unfamiliar, a No Go Zone is an Islamic ministate, within a country. They are autonomous, in that they permit no outside influence or interference. They have their own law – Sharia. They have their own courts, their own police, for want of a better term. Non-Muslim French citizens, for example, are not permitted entry, nor are police. Pretty absurd, eh?
Is this grand rally going to cause those who control these No Go Zones to all of a sudden allow French, German, British authorities to come in and start policing them? I’ll make a prediction and say no!
So with that firmly established, will French authorities, for example, go in any way? Will they finally come to their senses and demand that Muslims in France, and elsewhere, assimilate into society or get out of their countries?
Or will they just hold a bunch of rallies, hold candlelight vigils and wonder what happened when they get attacked again? Another prediction. It will be rallies, excuses and vigils.
And this also goes for the mainstream media. Take, for example, the CNN.com article I referenced earlier. The originally posted article was 15 paragraphs. Within all those paragraphs, terror is mentioned twice, terrorist twice and terrorism once. Nowhere are any of those words associated with Islam, Islamic or Muslim.
However, the radical Islamic scumbags that claimed those 17 lives are described as “suspects” four times.
The liberal media, just as the deaf, dumb and blind politicians, have not the courage to even tie the two together.
Well, unlike the war of words, which is the only war liberals can wage, it won’t work this time. They can’t just wish it away, change its name, or deny its existence like they do with everything else.
Radical Muslims will not stop with threatening language or speeches about unity, defiance and courage. Their arsenal of words are just words, and a ring quite hollow to the ear of radical Islamists.