Category Archives: States rights

Posted in • • • • • • •

Weapon Wednesday – Article V Convention of States: Backstop against Runaway Statism

By comment

from Brent Smith for World Net Daily:

A few years ago, former South Carolina Republican Sen. Jim DeMint said: “The United States is a terminal patient on an unsustainable course. Calling an Article V Convention of States would be too risky not to attempt.”

He is more right today than even then.

The left has always been opposed to a Convention of States (COS), provided for in Article V of the U.S. Constitution, but over the last several years, as the COS movement has grown in popularity, conservatives too have come out against it. read more

Posted in • • • • • • • • • •

Unconstitutional Election Fraud – Brought to you by the State of Pennsylvania

By comment

by: Brent Smith

For anyone, like me, who considers themselves a “constitutional” conservative, this election has been infuriating. We can hear and see the fraud. We know none of this passes our smell test. But possibly the most frustrating is the State of Pennsylvania.

Officials and courts, including even the Pennsylvania supreme Court, committed fraud against the people of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by changing the rules of how elections must be run, when they are to be and what a “legal” vote is. This is indisputable.

Mark Levin discusses the many fraudulent facets of this most recent election, and that despite the left’s insistence upon safety due to COVID, most of these violations and usurpations of the State and federal constitutions were instituted well before anyone knew there was such thing as this coronavirus.

from Mark Levin:

read more

Posted in • • • • • • • • •

The Unprecedented Denial of Our Natural Rights

By comment

by: Brent Smith

In late April, 2020, Thomas G. West, professor of politics at Hillsdale College, joined Dr. Larry Arnn, president of Hillsdale, and two other esteemed conservative academics, Kevin Portteus and Adam Carrington, in a symposium to discuss, “The Coronavirus and the Constitution.”

Normally I single out just Dr. Arnn, as no one, in my opinion, is more versed in everything related to our founding fathers, the documents they created, and how prescient their thoughts and writings are and how they still apply to today’s societal ills.

What most impressed me, beyond the obvious expertise of the subject, is his plain-spokeness. He didn’t spend his time spewing talking points or bloviating in academic gibberish speak, as virtually all leftist academics do.

West plainly and succinctly explained how the left is violating, not only our natural rights, but their oaths of office to uphold the national and their owns State’s Constitutions.

Enjoy the education: read more

Posted in • • • • • • •

Illegal Aliens Can Vote – So Says the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

By comment

from Daniel Horowitz at Conservative Review:

Horowitz: States can declare martial law on citizens but can’t stop noncitizens from voting

Blue gavel and law books

DNY59 | Getty Images

A broken clock is right twice a day, but our judiciary is always wrong, as it has perfectly twisted fundamental rights inside out and has flipped state and federal powers upside down.

We have finally discovered a power that the courts feel a state does not have. At a time when states are violating our rights to life, liberty, and property, restricting free movement, regulating interstate commerce and travel, and forming interstate compacts – all against the most basic foundations of our Constitution – the courts have finally stepped in to limit state powers. A federal court has ruled states cannot … ask for proof of citizenship to vote. read more

Posted in • • • • • • • •

Podcast – The Electoral College – They Brought it Up – Not Us

By comment4 Comments

by: Brent Smith at the Common Constitutionalist

Okay – here we go again with the Electoral College. Why do we have to keep talking about the antiquated Electoral College?

But we on the right didn’t bring it up. The democrats continue to. I could be discussing other stuff, and really, who cares about the Electoral College. It’s dry and boring and does it really matter anyway?

Well, we better care and care a lot, because if the left wins the propaganda war and eventually somehow amends the Constitution or something, this country is finished. That’s not hyperbole – it’s cold hard fact.

If you want the Founders explanation of why it’s needed, read Federalist Paper, number 68, written by Alexander Hamilton.

I’m just doing it in modern day bad English.

So as long as the left keeps trying to ram pure democracy, mob rule, down our throats, we have to continue to at least try to educate those who might listen to the logic and beauty of our election system. read more

Posted in • • • • • •

Does the Constitution Mean Anything Anymore?

By comment

by: Brent Smith at the Common Constitutionalist

Scroll Down for Audio Version

This story goes back about 7 months, but it’s still as relevant today as it was then, and will become more so as we get closer to the 2020 elections. It’s about a lawsuit that struck down a Kansas State voter I.D. law.

I recall reading about it but didn’t give it much more than a passing tisk-tisk at the time. But somehow it recently resurfaced. I thought it was something new so I read it judiciously. And that’s when it hit me. As I’m a States Right guy, I don’t know why it didn’t then, but it sure struck a chord this time around.

In June, 2018, Reuters reported that, “A federal judge struck down a Kansas law requiring proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in a decision on Monday that could make voter registration easier in the state in the run-up to November mid-term elections. The ruling ended a two-year legal battle in which Democrats argued that such ID laws targeted voters who typically support their party, such as the young and minorities. Republican proponents of the law said it was necessary to ensure the integrity of elections.”

Yes, the Dems do have a point. What they appear to be saying is that the young and minorities are just too darn stupid and/or lazy to obtain the proper I.D. necessary to register. It sounds harsh, but how can we conclude anything else. According to the Democrat Party, their voters are just that stupid. It’s a wonder they can find their way out of bed in the morning, much less to the polls. read more

Posted in • • • • • •

Video Podcast – Schools Need a Lesson on the Fourth Amendment

By comment1 Comment

by: Brent Smith at the Common Constitutionalist

A civil liberties attorney has a problem with two Indiana public high schools. The schools announced that they will randomly drug test 10 students who wish to engage in extracurricular activities, for 10 drugs.

The attorney claims this is a Constitutional violation under the Fourth Amendment.

Surprise, surprise – I agree, because it is and in today’s podcast I explain the reason why. read more

Posted in • • • • • •

There is Little Risk in an Article V Convention of States

By comment4 Comments

By: the Common Constitutionalist

Scroll Down for Audio Version

It’s not often that I disagree with my fellow conservative authors. And if I do, I rarely if ever outwardly express that disagreement. But I’m making an exception to voice my disappointment of one “conservative” author who wrote about the potential “dangers” of an Article V Convention of States.

The article is entitled “A Convention of States is Not Without Risks.”

Right off the bat, I thought – oh here we go – another attempt at persuading the less informed of the dangers of an out-of control, free-for all, convention. As if anyone can propose anything and the idiot States will just line up in favor, like so many lemmings.

The author begins by attempting to win over the right, by writing that, “Patriots and Constitutional Conservatives across America are sickened and disgusted by our Federal Court Judges and our Cowardly Congress filled with ‘Demon-crats and RINO’s’ who have largely ignored the will and wishes of the citizens and voters for decades.”

This of course will cause “Constitutional Conservatives” to stand up and cheer.

But then he ventures down the road that many fearmongers have by stating that, “We must recognize however, that there will be ‘deep blue liberal’ states present at any such Convention; Deep Blue New York, for example, is, alongside Deep Red Texas are two of the eleven states whose legislatures have called for a Convention of States.”

The 11 States that have made application are, in no particular order, AK, GA, FL, ND, TN, LA, AL, IN, MO, OK, AZ, and of course TX. Funny, but I don’t see NY there. read more

Posted in • • • •

So Who is Really in Charge of Immigration

By comment

by: the Common Constitutionalist

Scroll Down for Audio Version

It’s obvious and has been demonstrated repeatedly as of late, that the Democrat Party cares less for American citizens than it does for foreign visitors and illegal immigrants.

The Party has also exhibited a willingness to flaunt or outright break the law in doing so.

Being that the Common Constitutionalist is not an actual Constitutional scholar, I cannot say for certain if President Trump’s temporary ban of people from seven foreign nations is or is not Constitutional – anymore than I can say Obama’s was. But I can read…and think.

However, the larger and longer lasting issue is that of illegal immigration, and States and cities refusal to follow federal law. However some would consider this a gray area.

If one were to look to the Constitution, which should always be first consulted, we would see that the word immigration doesn’t appear anywhere. What does is Article I, Section 8, clause 4, which states that, “Congress shall have the Power To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization…” read more

Posted in • • • •

My WND Weekly Exclusive – How state Republicans are wielding Trump power

By comment

How state Republicans are wielding Trump power

In case you haven’t noticed, the left is in full panic mode. They are rapidly losing what was thought not long ago to be an iron grip on American politics and culture. But Heir Obama has squandered their historic pre-eminence, preferring to concentrate only on his legacy. I suppose we should thank him for this.

Americans have what seems to be a penchant for concentrating only on presidential elections. Maybe because it’s easy. We have two, maybe up to four choices for the office, and that’s it. It requires almost no effort on the part of the electorate to decide between two candidates. read more