Russia asked FBI to Investigate Bomber Just 6 MONTHS Ago

After being spotted with ‘a militant’ on trip to Dagestan: Was it this known  terrorist who Boston killer liked on YouTube?

 

Speculation is growing that one of the Boston  bombers met a known Jihadist terrorist in 2011 – as it emerged the FBI failed to  follow up on a Russian tip that he was seen with an Islamic militant six  times.

On a YouTube account widely believed to  belong to Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, there are two videos on a playlist called  ‘terrorists’ created five months ago that since have been deleted.

Both videos appear under the name, ‘Amir Abu  Dujana rabbanikaly’ which is also the name used by Gadzhimurad Dolgatov, a  notorious Dagestani terrorist.

Investigators are pouring over the YouTube  account to see if they can confirm whether Tsarnaev had any links with Dolgatov,  who was killed by Russian security forces in Makhachkala in December 2012, after  a fierce gun battle.

These latest revelations question the  adequacy of the U.S intelligence community, who failed to spot the national  security threat posed by suspect Tamerlan  Tsarnaev and his younger brother Dzhokhar, despite the repeated  warnings.

Two grabs of videos believed to have been deleted from Tamerlan Tsarnaev's YouTube account that are reportedly of Gadzhimurad Dolgatov - a Dagestani jihadist who died in 2012 after a vicious stand-off with Russian security services
Two grabs of videos believed to have been deleted from Tamerlan Tsarnaev's YouTube account that are reportedly of Gadzhimurad Dolgatov - a Dagestani jihadist who died in 2012 after a vicious stand-off with Russian security services
 Two grabs of videos believed to have been deleted from  Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s YouTube account that are reportedly of Gadzhimurad Dolgatov  – a Dagestani jihadist who died in 2012 after a vicious stand-off with Russian  security services
 

On Sunday, a Dagistani police official source  revealed toNBC  News that the Russian  internal security service contacted the FBI in November with some questions  about Tamerlan and handed over a copy of a case file on him.

The 26-year-old Chechen, who was living in  the U.S. after being granted refugee status in 2002, first caught the eye of  authorities after he was spotted meeting with a person involved  in the militant Islamic underground movement in Dagestan. They met at a mosque on  six occasions, the source said.

The source told NBC the militant and Tsarnaev disappeared before authorities  could speak with them; they added that the FBI never responded. A senior law  enforcement official said that the FBI’s earlier investigation did not turn up  anything and they did not have the legal authority to keep tabs on  him.

Continue Reading

 

Ricin Letters Sent Dy Democrat

Yet Another Democrat Tries To Assassinate An American President

The would-be assassin, whose fame I will not contribute to by writing his name, sent letters laced with ricin to Obama and to Republican Senator Roger Wicker. Inhaling the toxin is deadly, and all it takes to kill a human is an amount 1/288 the size of an aspirin.

A picture of the man, a white guy whom I will henceforth refer to as John, surfaced on the Internet (where pictures are wont to surface). It comes from his Facebook page and shows John kneeling down beside the back bumper of a car, which has a sticker on it that reads, “Christian and a Democrat.” John is giving the sticker a thumbs-up.

However, his Facebook page lists his political views as “Independent.” So the fact that he gave a pro-Democrat bumper sticker a thumbs-up and also tried killing a Democratic president likely means he is one of those people who feel that Obama is too moderate, that the Democratic Party is not suitably liberal, and therefore has registered as an Independent.

Continue Reading

Issa Tells CIA: Plan for Massive Benghazi Probe

Escalating his investigation of the deadly terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi last year, Rep. Darrell Issa warned CIA and other government officials Wednesday to lawyer-up in preparation for a massive probe.
 
The California Republican who chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee sent letters Wednesday suggesting that some witnesses lawyer up before being called to testify, The Hill reported. He also suggested that some witnesses should be prepared for retaliation from their employer, depending on their responses.
 

“Some witnesses may be required to retain personal counsel to represent them before the committee and in the event the agency subsequently retaliates against them for cooperating with the committee’s investigation,” the California Republican who chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee said in separate letters to the CIA, State Department, and Pentagon.

Issa said some witnesses have already been cooperating with the investigation into the attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans on Sept. 11, 2012, the Hill reported.

 

“During the course of the investigation, numerous individuals have approached the committee with information related to the attack,” he wrote in the letters.

Continue Reading

Obama Slashed Domestic Terror Budget

Have you seen this anywhere in the mainstream, drive-by media? No? And I’m sure you won’t.

from the UK Dail Mail:

Obama administration has SLASHED budget for domestic bombing prevention by 45 per cent, says former Homeland Security Assistant Secretary

 

Barack Obama’s administration has cut the budget nearly in half for preventing domestic bombings, MailOnline can reveal. 

Under President George W. Bush, the Department of Homeland Security had $20 million allocated for preventing the use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) by terrorists working inside the United States. The current White House has cut that funding down to $11 million.

That assessment comes from Robert Liscouski, a former Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Protection, in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings on April 15 that killed three Americans and injured at least 173 others.

He told MailOnline that the Obama-era DHS is, on the whole, about as well-positioned as it was during the Bush administration to handle the aftermath of the April 15 bombings in Boston, ‘but the Obama administration has continued to cut the budget for offices such as the Office for Bombing Prevention from $20 million started under Bush, to $11 million today.’

Continue Reading

Harry Reid’s Omnibus Background Check Bill

by: the Common Constitutionalist

 

After reading about the gang of 16 turncoat Republicans that voted with the dems to allow Harry Reid’s gun bill to move forward, I made a call.

I telephoned my Senator, Kelly Ayotte’s office in Washington to vent my spleen. I spoke with one of her lackeys, and she explained that the senator has always been pro-second amendment. I asked the lackey if the pro-gun Sen. actually read the very lengthy bill she voted to allow to proceed? The lackey had no answer. She just kept repeating how Sen. Ayotte was pro-second amendment. I told her that her answer, to me, assumed the senator had not and that I will report it that way. The lackey was none too happy with me. Frankly, at this point, I don’t really care.

At this very moment (writing this article), I am staring at page after page after excruciating page of Senate bill S – 649.

The name of the bill is: S – 649: Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act of 2013.

How could anyone be against safe communities and schools? They might as well call it the “Don’t Shoot Grandma Act.” After all, who would vote to shoot grandma?

It doesn’t take long to question the sincerity of the bill. It starts in the very first sentence: “To ensure that all individuals who should be prohibited from buying a firearm are listed in the national instant criminal background check system and require a background check for every firearm sale, and for other purposes.”

See anything a little creepy about the preamble? You too, eh? I see two problems. The first is relatively minor, the second, seriously major.

First: there is no way to ensure full registration. It’s a crock, but it sounds great and isn’t that really the most important thing? It doesn’t matter whether it actually happens as long as they care enough to wish it to be so. It is tailored directly to the low information citizen.

Second: this is the scary part: “… And for other purposes”. Yikes! What does that mean? Answer: anything they want it to – after it is signed into law.

This bill, like so many others, is purposely written to go on forever. Here is the link to read it for yourself, assuming you are as masochistic as I: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/s649/text.

Here’s a little interesting factoid to ponder that directly relates to this bill.

In 2007 Delaware passed a law making it a minimum class A misdemeanor to spank a child under the age of 18. Coincidentally, uncle Joe Biden’s son Beau was one of the people who pushed the law. Small world, isn’t it?

So Delaware passed a law. So what? Well, here is so what.

Bill S – 649, Section 111: … Proposed Grants, b) Use of Grants, (1) In General, (E) “supply accurate and timely court orders and records of misdemeanor crimes…”

Putting it together? Any parent in Delaware convicted of spanking their child (don’t laugh, it’s the law) will not be able to legally own a firearm and I’m sure that’s not the only example.

Not only is the bill written, at times in the vaguest terms possible, but also it continually cites other laws  – causing one to either research every cited law or throw their hands up in frustration.

This is where we are headed folks. I have now finished reading the entire bill and I’ll tell you, it would take Justice Scalia and 20 researchers several weeks to interpret. No lie! That means there is no Senator that will fully understand what they are voting for. Just like Obamacare.

Oh, and by the way, it never did reveal what the “other purposes” were.

Obamacare: Failure By Design

Obamacare: Intentionally Designed to Fail

 

Since shortly after Obamacare came out, I’ve been expressing the opinion that  it was intentionally designed to fail.  Here’s the latest evidence –

By health insurance definition, a pre-existing health condition is one that  existed a set period of time before the applicant applied for the policy,  regardless of whether it was being actively treated or not.  Often times these  conditions are not the fault of the person applying for coverage, and I’ve  always strongly felt that there needs to be viable options for these people.   But very often, the health conditions that people have are DIRECTLY their own  fault because of the bad habits they know they have yet keep on doing.  And  under Obamacare, these people will be charged the same premiums as those of us  who are health conscious and rarely need medical treatment.  Sorry – but I have  a huge problem with that.  People who get struck with conditions they didn’t  actually strive to get, I empathize with them.  But to those who knowingly,  stubbornly went out of their way to get sick, shut up and pay for what you did  to yourself.  I shouldn’t have to help pay for your intentional indiscretions.

Continue Reading