Journalist Finds Out What Happens in Sweden

by: the Common Constitutionalist

Scroll Down for Audio Version

Even after weeks, liberals are still trying to prove to the nation that Trump was not only wrong about Sweden, but he is, as are we, all wet regarding terrorism and the problems with Islam.

There was and is nothing happening in Sweden. And there certainly aren’t any of those so-called “No-Go” Zones in the country, or frankly any country. No-Go zones are a myth fabricated by Islamaphobes like you and me.

On January 20, 2017, Emil Karlsson posted an article on the site, “Debunking Denialism.” How quaint.

His article states that, “Debunking Denialism has taken on several such cases of pseudoscientific bigotry, such as falsely comparing ethnic minorities to poisonous M&Ms, conspiracy theories about alleged white genocide, how anti-immigration activists abuse Swedish rape statistics or data on reported shootings in the Swedish city of Malmö. Now it is time to take on the widespread myth that Sweden supposedly has 55 no-go zones where criminals rule society and police are afraid or incapable of entering.”

And you know what? He’s right. If one were to define a No-Go zone incorrectly, as liberals do, there technically are none of these zones anywhere. And of course this is the slick trick of the left. Use a definition which defies reality and then advance that definition to debunk said reality. read more

Ted Cruz Was Right to Suggest Patrols of Muslim Enclaves

by: the Common Constitutionalist

Remember when Ted Cruz posted to his Facebook page the now infamous statement regarding Muslim neighborhoods? “We need to empower law enforcement to patrol and secure Muslim neighborhoods before they become radicalized,” he wrote on the 22nd of March.

Later the same day, due to backlash from the spineless set on the left and right, the Cruz campaign clarified his position. It read: “We know what is happening with these isolated Muslim neighborhoods in Europe. If we want to prevent it from happening here, it is going to require an empowered, visible law enforcement presence that will both identify problem spots and partner with non-radical Americans who want to protect their homes.”

Personally I don’t think there was any need for further clarity, but we who are more informed about everything Islam would of course need no explanation. This was not for us, nor was it for the denialist left or the spineless right who fear upsetting everyone and anyone by speaking the truth. This post was no doubt intended for the less informed “security” voter. read more

Trump Isn’t Wrong On Muslim Immigration

by: the Common Constitutionalist

Another week, another Trumpism. It seems not a week goes by where Trump isn’t blowing up the headlines – and the heads of the left and the establishment right. And on occasion we conservatives feel the need to defend him, or at least his statements.

Of course everyone is speaking of the Trump statement (mostly negatively), now heard round the world that he is calling for “A complete and total shutdown of all Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what’s going…”

One of his supporters, standing in a rather long line at a Trump event in South Carolina was asked by a CNN reporter whether she had a problem with the plan. The supporter said: “That’s a very prudent idea and I think that he’s done due diligence when he makes that statement.” She added that, “We have to protect American citizens and the vetting process lacks integrity.” The reporter then says, although not to the Trump supporter, that, “That’s not true. In fact the vetting process, run through multiple agencies, is vigorous.”

Well, Ms. CNN reporter – that may be true, but whether the “vetting” process is vigorous or not is immaterial. If Muslims coming into the country have no “paper trail,” one could “vet” them until the cows come home and still no nothing about them or their intentions. I do though have a problem with the supporters thought that Trump did his due diligence. No he didn’t. He just blurted it out. At least it appeared that way. But this too is immaterial. It takes no due diligence to know a good portion of these Muslims, certainly the refugees, cannot be vetted and therefore should be denied entry. read more

The War Has Begun Now That ISIS Has Sufficient Forces In Place

by: the Common Constitutionalist

We’ve learned some important things about the attacks and the attackers of the Paris massacre. We’ve learned that ISIS evidently either coordinated the attacks or granted operational authority to what I’ve coined Wilayat Paris. And it appears the coordination efforts came through Belgium, where at least two of the radical Islamists have been discovered to be from the same neighborhood.

Some have asked why they have waited until now to strike? Terrorists have been threatening for years that they plan to attack us and Europe. Virtually since it’s forming the new ISIS caliphate has been threatening attacks. So what’s taken so long?

Well Europe, and to a lesser extent America, has many majority Muslim regions. They’ve been coming for years and settling in major cities across Europe. Anyone who understands “Civilization Jihad” knows this is how radical Islam has always intended to conquer the West.

We don’t actually think the flood of refugees is to escape the “war torn” regions of Iraq and Syria, do we? To be sure, some have – but when the majority of these “refugees” are young males of “fighting age,” should we not be questioning why? Some estimates are higher than 70% of the “refugees” are young men. Of course, why would people question it if they see these mass migrations through the filter of the main stream liberal press, who only show and report on women and children.

These Muslim refugees are certainly not all escaping the fight. They are in fact an ISIS Trojan Horse. They pray on the sympathy and empathy of the West – knowing full well where the soft targets are – the easy marks. The Palestinian terrorists have been doing it to Israel for decades – faking casualties and funerals and blaming the “carnage” on ruthless Israeli attacks. And we in West predictable fall for the theatre every time. Recall the reaction of the entire West when one dead child washed up on a beach in Turkey. I felt terrible also, but who’s to say it wasn’t all staged. I’ll bet it was. And boy did it ever work – for after that the West allowed the “refugee” floodgates to really open. Recall that it was after this event that American politicians began the push to bring thousands of them here. We feel so bad – let them all in – and they did, not giving a thought to the suicidal course they were charting. read more

Fox News Emerson is not Such an Idiot

By: the Common Constitutionalist

So Fox News security analyst Security analyst Steven Emerson said last Sunday that “non-Muslims just simply don’t go in” to the city, during a discussion of multiculturalism in Britain after last week’s Paris attacks.

Emerson was speaking of the city of Birmingham England, when he claimed “The whole city is Muslim.” Emerson has been mocked and verbally Emersonattacked mercilessly for his claim.

Prime Minister David Cameron called Emerson a “complete idiot”, for claiming the city is totally Muslim. Emerson has been corrected many times by various left leaning publications and news outlets, saying that Birmingham is only 22% Muslim.

And of course – how could 22% of any city’s population take over the whole thing. That’s just absurd, right?

An interesting side note: In 1933, Hitler’s Nazi party had about 2 million members, a little over 2.5% of the 67 million German population. Sometimes, it doesn’t take many. A small minority of determined radicals can do great and disproportionate damage. Just look at the Obama administration! read more

Terrorist Attack – Now What – Now Nothing

by: the Common Constitutionalist

Paris is attacked – attacked by Islamic barbarians bent on revenge for mocking the prophet Mohammed. They felt as though they needed to defend the honor and name of the prophet.

As an aside, if Mohammed is supposed to be the father of Islam, the right hand of Allah, like some omniscient being – why does he need to be defended? Why would anyone or anything who is supposed to have a direct line to Allah have to be defended by mere mortals? Just asking.

paris rallyOkay, so radical Muslims go on the offensive. What is the response? Well after the French Special Forces did what they do – killed the terrorists – then what?

The city of Paris host a massive “unity rally in defiance of a terrorist spree that claimed 17 lives,” reports CNN.

And it was quite the impressive rally with many dignitaries in attendance. Leaders from France, Germany, Spain, Great Britain were in attendance, as well as Netanyahu of Israel, the Palestinian Authority’s Abbas and the King of Jordan, amongst others.

Now I don’t mean to sound harsh and non-appreciative of the large show of “unity” and “defiance” – but now what? So they have a rally. So what? Is that supposed to scare away the Islamic radicals? read more