News from Not around the Globe

A New Bill Proposed
Florida State Representative Brad Drake has proposed a bill to eliminate lethal injection as a means for capital punishment. Why would do he that? He must be an enlightened anti-capital punishment advocate. Not exactly. Controversy over lethal injections erupted in Florida last month when the state executed Manuel Valle. Valle’s lawyers argued that a new lethal drug cocktail would cause him pain and therefore constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Boo Hoo for him. He’s been on death row almost 33 years for killing a police officer & wounding another. That’s 33 years longer than he deserved.


Rep. Drake proposes replacing lethal injection with…….wait for it……..firing squads. The Electric Chair, known affectionately as “Old Sparky”, would be the primary method. An inmate may, however, choose the firing squad option. Drake said, “If the chair doesn’t suit the criminal, then we will provide them a .45 caliber lead cocktail instead.” Drake added, “There shouldn’t be anything controversial about a .45-caliber bullet. If it were up to me we would just throw them off the Sunshine Skyway Bridge and be done with it”.

Rush disses Mitt
Limbaugh says, “Romney is not a conservative”. Speaking on his radio show Thursday, he said although he likes Mitt very much personally, he just isn’t a conservative. He describes Romney’s strategy as the “ I’m not Obama” angle.

“The Republican base doesn’t want Romney,” Rush said. “I don’t how many people in the Republican establishment are aware of that.” I might add the Republican establishment doesn’t care what the base wants. They never have, why start now.

Cain gets Backing
Herman Cain is beginning to collect some heavyweight backers for his 9-9-9 tax plan. House budget committee chairman Rep. Paul Ryan and Ronald Reagan’s economic guru Art Laffer both expressed their support for the plan which would replace the current tax code. The Club for Growth has also endorsed Cain’s plan.

Laffer & Reagan


“I love the 9-9-9 plan, it’s a great first step,” Laffer told Fox News’ Bret Baier. “This is a lot better than our current tax laws that are filled with all sorts of ducks, chickens, pigs and turkeys. They’ve just got to be cleaned out and we’ve got to completely revamp the codes.” Eventually the Cain plan calls for the complete elimination of income taxes – and the IRS – and the introduction of what he calls the Fair Tax, in which the all Federal revenue would come from a sales tax.

The Grass is Greener & Cleaner

With all the recent news coming out regarding the Green Energy scam being perpetrated on us I decided to look into what exactly is a “Green Job”.

First a little background.

According to HotAir last week: After spending $17.2 billion of the $38.6 billion allocated for green-jobs stimulation, the programs have created a total of just over 3500 jobs, for a price tag of $4.85 million each.

A separate $500 million green jobs program at the Dept. of Labor, which was funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (The stimulus fund), aims to find employment for almost 80,000 people by providing grants for labor exchange and job training projects.

So how many workers has this program actually placed? As of June 30th … 8,035, or about a tenth of what was projected after burning through 40% of the funding. That actually comes to a surprisingly modest $25,000 per job placement until you discover that total includes temp jobs; only 1,336 people found jobs lasting longer than 6 months.

So how is it that Labor Secretary, Hilda Solis produced a study claiming 2.7 million Americans work in what they now call “Clean Economy” positions?

Hilda Solis

Easy, fudge the numbers, change the definition. Just like Global Warming became Climate Change. Those who control the language, control the argument. See how easy this is!

At a Congressional hearing a few weeks ago Republicans questioned the Obama Administration about inflating the number of Green Jobs by vastly broadening the definition. The definition now includes virtually anyone working in mass transit.

It is interesting that the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) admits it is still trying to properly define a green job but, never the less, can produce numbers.

During the hearings, Representative Connie Mack of Florida said, “Just because a bus driver is driving a hybrid bus doesn’t mean it’s a green job.” Solis said it did.

Connie Mack


BLS Commissioner Keith Hall added, “Our Green Jobs include mass transit, so actually any bus service.”

Quite surprised, Rep. Darryl Issa asked, “ So let me understand this…You’re counting everyone that drives a bus as a green job?” Hall answered, “ Mass transit is a green service.” I guess that means yes.

Darrell Issa


Solis’s report also claims that college professors that teach a class on ecology, reporters that write about the environment & think tank personnel who discuss the environment would all meet the criteria of a green job.

And that’s how you get to 2.7 million. Easy Peasy.

It leaves me speechless and that doesn’t often happen.

The Great Debate Part……. I lost count

I watched last nights Republican debate held at Dartmouth College. I was thinking of going to this one, it being not too far from home. I decided not to. As is just like a Patriots game, the best seat in the house is in the house.

Everyone did fairly well. That is to say there were no real blunders.

There were more fireworks prior to the debate with Chris Christie’s endorsement of Romney. I guess great moderate minds think alike.

As RedState describes, “During his announcement, he (Christie) disparaged conservatives who oppose Romneycare, by suggesting that any attempt to compare it to Obamacare is “completely intellectually dishonest.” Governor Christie might want to look in the mirror or step down as a prominent spokesman for the Republican Party.”

Christie (despite Ann Coulter’s love for him), as well as many talking heads on our side, is not a conservative. His endorsement of Romney means 2 things. A) Romney is also not a conservative (not a shock). B) He is vying for the V.P. slot.

Back to the subject at hand.

The debate was to be solely regarding the economy. Everyone seemed to stick to that theme. No real digressions.

Romney is evidently still the man to beat. He’s been through a lot more of these things, so he is quite polished & did not get knocked off his game. No one seemed to attack him this time around.

Obamacare was mentioned on several occasions, but Romneycare was never broached. That I don’t understand. Romneycare is an unmitigated disaster, despite Mitt’s claims to the contrary. A recent Suffolk University study of MassCare (RomneyCare) concludes that over 18,000 jobs have been lost & has increased health insurance costs by 4.3 billion dollars. And there’s that little thing regarding Romney’s own healthcare advisors meeting with the Obama team regarding implementation of Obamacare. But there’s no similarity.

Why this is not brought up is beyond me.

I guess the only one digressing from the topic is me. Back to it.

Cain was the only one who got close to going after Mitt when he compared the simplicity of his 9-9-9 plan to Romney’s more complicated 59 point plan. Romney did deflect rather well explaining the country’s problems were more complex & were better addressed with his plan.

Herman Cain had a great night, I thought. Much more attention was afforded him due to his recent frontrunner status. Like other debates, when one candidate mentioned something of another candidate, he was able to rebut. They all kept harping on Cain’s 9-9-9 plan so he was allowed a rebuttal in each case, which kept him in the spotlight. One of the moderators, Charlie Rose, actually cautioned the others to stop bringing it up.

There was a segment of the debate where each candidate would ask a question of another. These were mostly directed at the frontrunners, namely Romney & Cain. What I found fascinating was a softball question Mitt threw at Bachmann. I don’t even recall what the question was. I just wondered why. Maybe he is trying to groom her for a possible V.P. slot. Romney knows he will need the Tea Party if he wins the nomination.

Rick Perry appeared to be running for Energy Secretary. It was basically, “Drill Baby Drill”. That’s all he had, which I love, but it got old.

Michele Bachmann was great at she launched into the moderator that the government created the country’s financial mess, not the evil banks. It was great. She left the moderator speechless.

Newt picked up the baton and went on a tirade regarding that and the Federal reserve. He ended by implying that Barney Frank & Chris Dodd should be sharing a prison cell. Left the moderators’ mouths agape. Absolutely awesome!

In the end, Romney did well, unfortunately. Cain did well also. He does need to become more comfortable with his top-tier status. Perry is toast. Bachmann did well. Santorum did ok, but he won’t last. I like him though. Huntsman is a lib in disguise. Ron Paul is Ron Paul.

I’ve heard most say that Romney won again by default, simply because didn’t slip up. My winner, Newt again. He is always the smartest guy in the room. He is aggressive. You can’t trip him up because he knows everything. He won’t take any crap & if someone tries to give it, he’ll slam them for it. I wish to heck I could support him.

California Dreamin

One of my readers recently read an article on the new California “Dream Act”. They suggested I tackle this topic & so I shall. Thanks for the suggestion and it pisses me off too.

The Dream Act is a 2 part plan. In July, Governor Brown signed AB 130 (part 1), making funding from private sources available to undocumented students (criminal aliens). With Saturday’s signing of AB 131, the California Dream Act passed in its entirety, granting undocumented students access to public and private funding for college. The new Act will reported cost a minimum of 14.5 million dollars a year. That’s a state estimate so it will be at least double to triple that. Remember, undocumented = criminal.

The bill was introduced by Assemblyman Gil Cedillo (D-Los Angeles), who praised Brown for showing courage in signing it. “After having invested 12 years in the high school education of these young men and women, who are here through no fault of their own,” Cedillo said, “it’s the smartest thing for us to do to permit these students to get scholarships and be treated like every other student.”

Treated like any other student? They’re not. They, with or without the help of their parents, broke the law, which makes them criminals. For that they should be punished. Not with jail time for which we will have to pay, but with deportation.

Astonishly the L.A. Times editorial board urged Governor Moonbeam (Jerry Brown) to sign part deux of the Dream Act.

The Times writes, “One argument in favor of the act is that it would prevent undocumented students from falling into what the editorial board sees as a “permanent underclass.” Additionally, the measure would prime these young people to replace baby boomers on the verge of retirement. But realistically, AB 131 is just the beginning.”

They continue, “So far, federal lawmakers have declined to provide a path to citizenship, and they are unlikely to produce any such bill in the near future. At least California lawmakers can offer some hope for students who want to pursue the American dream.” I think you have to be American to pursue the American dream. I always say, the first step to achieving the dream is to break the law. That shows you’re serious.

Illegal immigration is considered a Class B misdemeanor.
According to Federal law, a Class B misdemeanor is an offense punishable by imprisonment of at least thirty one days but not more than six months.

But instead of that, the California law allows, “Illegal immigrants who graduate from a state high school and demonstrate both merit and need, to apply for publicly funded scholarships and other state aid. As stated, the bill passed last month already allows these deserving students to apply for privately funded scholarships.” I am still researching the definition of “deserving”. I guess it doesn’t mean what I thought.

But, some might say, it’s their money. Why should I care how they wish to spend it. They must have excess funds to pay for the program.

They would be wrong. As of 2008 California had more than $60 BILLION in debt and that amount is growing rapidly.
California has no law limiting the amount of public debt the state can accumulate. Adding debt approved by voters but not yet borrowed brings the total to $136 billion. That was 2008. By this year (2011) it owes $2,542 per person. That’s on top of the massive federal burden.

Cost aside, isn’t it fascinating that if a state wants to strengthen its illegal immigration laws & do the job the feds refuse to, all hell breaks loose. Federal Judges issue stays, lawsuits are filed, etc. But yet when the laws, which are quite clear, are flouted by the states, there is not a peep.

I’m a big “States Rights” advocate. Isn’t this just a states rights issue? Why can’t they do as they wish? Interesting point, but the same people who would claim that always argue that immigration is a federal responsibility. When a state wants to crack down or control their own borders, what happens? That was a rhetorical question. We all know the answer.

In our current climate of political correctness there doesn’t appear to be a solution to this mess. I, however, have a couple of suggestions.

Enact a federal law stating that there will never be a federal bailout of any state. Each state sinks or swims on its own. Once a coddled criminal alien leaves a friendly state he will be deported and any cost incurred will be paid for by that state. At least they will be more likely to stay put.

The fact is, California is already too far gone. Our job is to see to it that they don’t drag us all down with them. If states wish to flush their own money down the crapper, that’s their business, but don’t dare come crying to us when the inevitable finally happens.

We need to build a wall, not only on our southern border, but extend it around all of California.

Religion of Lies

It couldn’t be put any better or more honestly. The facts are the facts, if one has the courage to accept them. I still don’t understand where the, “Islam is a peaceful religion” nonsense comes from. I have never seen one instance of this. If anyone can think of one, please share.

Just watch. Pat nails it.

George’s Wallet

So it seems every whacko leftist group in the country is involving itself in the Occupy Wall Street event. It is spreading throughout the country. It is mainly concentrated in large cities but is also extending to college campuses. According to the Daily Iowan; “The recent nationwide protests are sparking campus walkouts. On Wednesday, many colleges took part in the Occupy Colleges movement by urging students to walk out of their classes at noon. More than 75 colleges said they would participate.” Oh boy. I’m sure the kids are fully informed & are not just useful idiots.

Speaking of useful idiots; here’s a recent quote, “We’re not trying to grab the steering wheel or to control it,” said Michael Kink, executive director of the Strong Economy For All coalition. “We’re looking to find common cause and support the effort. It’s the right fight at the right time and we want to be part of it.” Well Michael, you naive little dweeb. You may not be looking to grab the wheel but the big players are and they will use you up & spit you out after you’ve served your purpose. But I digress.

Community groups like Make the Road New York, the Coalition for the Homeless, the Alliance for Quality Education and Community Voices Heard are also organizing for Wednesday’s action, and the labor/community coalitions United New York and Strong Economy For All are pitching coming out.

The United Federation of Teachers, 32BJ SEIU, 1199 SEIU, Workers United and Transport Workers Union Local 100 are all expected to participate.

Other groups include, People For The American Way, Planned Parenthood, Campaign For America’s Future, Democracy For America, Leadership Conference for Civil and Human Rights (LCCR), Common Cause, Public Campaign.

Did I see LCCR? Wasn’t Van Jones a member? Pure coincidence.

On its face this movement, as it were, seems to be fairly spontaneous. But of course, thinks like this never are. The usual suspects are involved and have been pulling the strings on this for a while.

Stephen Lerner

We have both Stephen Lerner of SEIU and Wade Rathke, founder of ACORN that suggested this idea earlier this year. Rathke is also a founding board member of the Soros-funded Tides Foundation, a key source of money for AdBusters magazine and countless other anti-business groups. And he is directly tied to more than a few unions including the SEIU.

Wade Rathke


In fact, the original call to “Occupy Wall Street” came from the magazine AdBusters.

The Ruckus Society of Oakland, Ca. is involved in the events. Ruckus’s roots are in the forest defense movement but have grown and transformed into a multiracial social and environmental justice organization.
Who else came out of Oakland? Oh, that’s right, Van Jones. Another coincidence?

Among other things, The Ruckus Society is generally credited with training violent protesters who vandalized and looted Seattle storefronts during the 1999 World Trade Organization meetings. Sounds like a stand up group. Where oh where does their funding come from? You & me perhaps? Nope. Several lefty organizations including the Tides Foundation. And where again do they get their funding. That’s right; Soro’s Open Society Institute provides them millions of dollars a year.

MoveOn.org is expected to mobilize its extensive online regional networks to drum up support for the effort. Ah yes. An event just wouldn’t be complete without MoveOn, which, of course, is funded by Soros.

On top of supplying activists to join the demonstrations, MoveOn is also staging what it calls a “massive ‘Virtual March on Wall Street’ online.” The Internet-based demonstrations are a collaborative effort with another radical and well-connected outfit tied to Soros called Rebuild the Dream.

Led by our old buddy, self-described communist and former Obama administration czar Van Jones, the “Dream” movement is a partnership between a host of Soros-financed “progressive” groups. Big Labor and even Planned Parenthood.

So as we can see it comes down, as it always does, to one man, Dr. Evil, George Soros, who in fact may be the anti-christ. The event should be renamed Occupy Wall Street & George’s wallet.

Give In, or I’ll Chant Something

Herman Cain is asked why the people are protesting.

Get with the program Herman. I know what they want. Here is their list of demands. It’s like a new Constitution, Dude!

Demand one: Restoration of the living wage. This demand can only be met by ending “free-trade” by re-imposing trade tariffs on all imported goods entering the American market to level the playing field for domestic family farming and domestic manufacturing as most nations that are dumping cheap products onto the American market have radical wage and environmental regulation advantages. Another policy that must be instituted is raise the minimum wage to twenty dollars an hr.

Demand two: Institute a universal single payer healthcare system. To do this all private insurers must be banned from the healthcare market as their only effect on the health of patients is to take money away from doctors, nurses and hospitals preventing them from doing their jobs and hand that money to wall st. investors.

Demand three: Guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment.

Demand four: Free college education.

Demand five: Begin a fast track process to bring the fossil fuel economy to an end while at the same bringing the alternative energy economy up to energy demand.

Demand six: One trillion dollars in infrastructure (Water, Sewer, Rail, Roads and Bridges and Electrical Grid) spending now.

Demand seven: One trillion dollars in ecological restoration planting forests, reestablishing wetlands and the natural flow of river systems and decommissioning of all of America’s nuclear power plants.

Demand eight: Racial and gender equal rights amendment.

Demand nine: Open borders migration. anyone can travel anywhere to work and live.

Demand ten: Bring American elections up to international standards of a paper ballot precinct counted and recounted in front of an independent and party observers system.

Demand eleven: Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all. Debt forgiveness of sovereign debt, commercial loans, home mortgages, home equity loans, credit card debt, student loans and personal loans now! All debt must be stricken from the “Books.” World Bank Loans to all Nations, Bank to Bank Debt and all Bonds and Margin Call Debt in the stock market including all Derivatives or Credit Default Swaps, all 65 trillion dollars of them must also be stricken from the “Books.” And I don’t mean debt that is in default, I mean all debt on the entire planet period.

Demand twelve: Outlaw all credit reporting agencies.

Demand thirteen: Allow all workers to sign a ballot at any time during a union organizing campaign or at any time that represents their yeah or nay to having a union represent them in collective bargaining or to form a union.

These demands will create so many jobs it will be completely impossible to fill them without an open borders policy.

Create jobs huh? Why bother. I will get paid whether I work or not. Why work? Why get an education? Why learn anything? I get free housing. I’m continuously debt free. I receive free healthcare. I can purchase anything I like due to my instant debt relief. This is great! Where do I sign?

We’ve been Jonesed, Van that Is.

We’ve all heard of Van Jones, the former “Green Jobs Czar”. I, for one, have heard a lot about him but never bothered to look into his background, until now. He’s an interesting fellow.

During the Rodney King trial in 1992 Jones was a Yale Law School student (of course, what else would he be) doing an internship for the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights (LCCR) in San Fransisco, which viewed the United States as an irredeemably racist nation.

Jones states, “I met all these young radical people of color – I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of.’ I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary. I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th. By August, I was a communist.”

He wrote an essay at the time which included, “After the [Rodney King] verdict, the pro-establishment folks were horrified as the rioting drove home a single truth: if “They” can get enough people out into the streets, “They” can do whatever they want to do.”
“Thus San Francisco’s Dukakis-backing, tofu-eating, Greenpeace-loving, sandal-wearing citizenry breathed a sigh of relief when the mayor snuffed out everyone’s rights and declared martial law.”
He sure did love you white liberals, eh. Interesting thought in the context of today’s “people in the streets”. My how things never change.

In 1993, Jones relocated to San Francisco, where he helped establish Bay Area Police Watch, a hotline and lawyer-referral service that began as a project of LCCR.

In 1996 he founded the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, which, claimed that the American criminal-justice system is infested with racism.

By the late 1990s, Jones was a committed Marxist-Leninist-Maoist who viewed police officers as the arch-enemies of black people, and who loathed capitalism for allegedly exploiting non white minorities worldwide. He became a leading member of Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (STORM), a now-defunct Bay Area Marxist-Maoist collective that was staffed by members of various local nonprofits, a number of whom had ties to the Ella Baker Center.

In the early 2000s, Jones and STORM were active in anti-Iraq War demonstrations organized by International ANSWER, a front group for the Marxist-Leninist Workers World Party. STORM also had ties to the South African Communist Party and it revered Amilcar Cabral, the late Marxist revolutionary leader (of Guinea-Bissau and the Cape Verde Islands) who lauded Lenin as “the greatest champion of the national liberation of the peoples.” (In 2006 Van Jones would name his own son “Cabral” — in Amilcar Cabral’s honor.)

During his time with STORM, Jones collaborated with many communist groups including, the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism (CCDS), a Communist Party USA splinter group, in the early 1990s. Elizabeth “Betita” Martinez continues to sit on the CCDS advisory board alongside other communists such as Angela Davis & Timuel Black (who served on Barack Obama’s 2004 Senate campaign committee). Martinez is also a board member of the Movement for a Democratic Society, the parent organization of Progressives for Obama.

In 2005 Jones and the Ella Baker Center produced the “Social Equity Track” for the United Nations’ World Environment Day celebration, a project that eventually would evolve into the Baker Center’s Green-Collar Jobs Campaign — “a job-training and employment pipeline providing ‘green pathways out of poverty’ for low-income adults in Oakland.” I’m sure that worked out great. I know, when I think green, I think Oakland.

Soon after attending the Clinton Global Initiative in September 2007, Jones launched “Green For All,” a non-governmental organization “dedicated to building an inclusive green economy strong enough to lift people out of poverty … advocating for local, state and federal commitment to job creation, job training, and entrepreneurial opportunities in the emerging green economy – especially for people from disadvantaged communities.”

In 2008 Jones published his first book, The Green Collar Economy, which focused on environmental and economic issues. The book received favorable reviews from such notables as Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi, Laurie David, Winona LaDuke, environmentalist Paul Hawken, and NAACP President/CEO Ben Jealous. There’s a shocker, huh.
In March of 2009, Obama appointed Jones his Green Jobs Czar.

In a July 2009 interview with Newsweek magazine, Jones, said he could not explain exactly what a “green job” is:
“Well, we still don’t have a unified definition, and that’s not unusual in a democracy. It takes a while for all the states and the federal government to come to some agreement. But the Department of Labor is working on it very diligently. Fundamentally, it’s getting there, but we haven’t crossed the finish line yet.”
I’ll define it. A green job is a government-subsidized job. That’s it.

So, there we have it; the history of a radical communist, racist. But at least he’s green.

Attribution: Free Republic

What would Keynes do? (Who cares)

Yesterday I read an article by Thomas Geoghegan on “The Nation.com” website. Yes it is indeed a far left rag, but sometimes it pays to see what they over yonder are thinking. They, once again, didn’t disappoint. I got about halfway, ok; I completed the first paragraph, when I thought maybe I should refute this.

The article he penned, or typed, was about the progressives’ economic hero John Maynard Keynes, the trade deficit & exports vs. imports. He asks himself, “What would Keynes do?”, regarding the economic malaise the country finds itself in.

Geoghegan writes, “For Keynes, the problem would be not just getting people into stores, or even getting employers to hire but getting our plutocracy (the rule or control of society by the wealthy) to invest. It’s not just our jobless rate but also our huge trade deficit that would appall him. He’d be aghast to see the United States bogged down in so much debt compared to the rest of the world.” I’m sure he would be aghast. I’m aghast by the debt we’ve accumulated also. Our private sector plutocracy, as he calls it, would love nothing more than to invest in this country. Unfortunately, like American Airlines (a sinking ship), the U.S. is not the greatest investment right now.

He continues, “Especially in a recession, he hated to see a country with a trade debt, or trade deficit, which arises when a country’s imports exceed exports. Indeed, when the trade deficit is as jaw dropping as the US trade deficit is now; it is harder to use Keynesian deficit spending to push employment back up.” Show me a single instance in history where Keynesian deficit spending has ever worked & hasn’t exasperated the problem. Of course imports exceed exports. Remember, we don’t make anything in this country anymore.

“The merchandise trade deficit of the United States is scary: $680.9 billion as of July 9…. It’s as if I’m pressing on the sucking chest wound in the world economy”, Geoghegan explains. That is a quite large number. Almost as much a the failed Keynesian style porkulus package with the Shovel Ready jobs that weren’t so shovel ready.

He states, “Actually, the trade deficit might be worse if there was full employment, our supposed goal, since we would have the money to buy even more hardware from abroad as we bite into more sandwiches at Jimmy John’s.” Never had a sandwich at Jimmy Johns, but now I know full employment is apparently a bad thing.

“Underneath that, there is a still bigger deficit, with US corporations outsourcing so many jobs. Here is a headline from the Wall Street Journal on April 19: BIG US FIRMS SHIFT HIRING ABROAD. During the 2000s, the Journal reports, while US multinationals have fired 2.9 million workers here, they have hired 2.4 million abroad. By the 1930s Keynes had notoriously turned against free trade and was giving lectures on the need for “national self-sufficiency. The one big (and smart) idea of absolute monarchy was to push exports over imports”, Geoghegan exclaims. That’s a lot of workers. It is very interesting that he never goes on to explain just why that might be.

An Absolute Monarch


“Keynes would not believe how Obama, the Tea Party, the Democrats, the Republicans—our leaders—pay so little attention to our whopping trade deficit, as if it had nothing at all to do with our slump.” Well, he got 3 out of 4 right.

He continues with, “But until we bring down the trade deficit and fix our balance of payments, there is no way out of debt.” (Balance of Payments: A summary of the international transactions of a country over a period of time including commodity and service transactions, capital transactions, and gold movements). I agree with that. “ It’s simple arithmetic”, he writes. “Somebody in this country is going to have to go into debt to make the balance-of-payments balance. Who’s going to do it? It’s the government or us. One day Uncle Obama or his successor will say, “I’m done going into debt to make the balance ‘balance.’ It’s your turn to go into debt to make the balance ‘balance.’”

Ok, I’ve had enough. These socialists will never get it. All that we’ve seen in this article is the typical lefty clap-trap. Somebody has to go into debt? Really? That’s the only answer?
There wasn’t a single word regarding cutting spending or the size of our bloated government. Not one word! How is going into debt going to balance anything, ever? No explanation of why jobs are leaving this country. Here’s the explanation. We are one, if not the most regulatorily burdened countries on earth. We have the highest corporate tax rate in the world. Gee, I wonder why companies are packing up? Why would anyone want to start a company without knowing what they have to comply with next year or even next week? Of course we have to import everything. Nanny government won’t allow us to make anything (Gibson Guitars, etc).

We did learn that an Absolute Monarchy can be a good thing. That’s something.

This is just another shining example that Keynes was an idiot & so is this author. I need an aspirin.